The Socratic Method and Opportunities for Its Application by Middle School Counselors to Increase Awareness About Bullying
The Socratic method is one of many methods used in counseling guidance services. The simple Socratic method can be applied by counselors to reduce bullying. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high school counselors in Yogyakarta Province recognize the Socratic method and whether there is an opportunity for this method to be applied to increase the awareness of students about bullying. A qualitative research approach was used, with a focus on phenomenology. The data were collected using an open questionnaire. The subjects consisted of 19 counselors from 15 secondary schools in the Yogyakarta Province who were selected by purposive sampling. Data analysis was carried out based on the guidance of Narbuko and Achmadi; this process consisted of three steps, namely editing, coding, and tabulation. The results showed that there was a substantial opportunity for the Socratic method to be applied by secondary school counselors in Yogyakarta Province to increase students’ awareness about bullying. This was evidenced by: 1) bullying continued to occur among middle school students, even though the counselors had used various methods and services to discuss bullying; 2) only a small number of school counselors had received information about the Socratic method, but the procedure for implementing the Socratic method was considered simple; and 3) all counselors stated that guidance on implementing the Socratic method was necessary and were enthusiastic about applying the Socratic method in an effort to increase students’ awareness about bullying
Keywords: Socratic method, opportunity, anti-bullying awareness
 Oda O. 117 reports of bullying received by the ministry of social affairs RI. [Internet]. Tribun Jogja 22th July 2017. Available from: http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2017/07/22/117-l]-bullying-diterima-tepsa-kemensosri-isah-juli-2017
 Sejiwa R. Penelitian [Internet]. Sejiwa research. Yayasan Semai Jiwa Amini. [updated 2020 Jan 7], Available from: http://sejiwa.org/bullying-researches/
 Danu D, Yogyakarta has the highest ranking for bullying cases. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Radio Edukasi, 19th December 2013. Available from: http://radioedukasi.kemdikbud.go.id/read/869/ yogyakarta-menduduki-peringkat-tertinggi-kasus-bullying.html
 Nauli I. Psychologist: schools must be able to create anti-bullying. [Internet]. Waspada Online, 10 September 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 11]. Available from: https://waspada.co.id/2015/09/psikolog-sekolahharus-bisa-cipta-anti-bullying/
 Maxwell M, Melete M. Introduction to the socratic method and its effect on critical thinking. [Internet]. Socraticmethod.net, 2014. [cited 2020 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.socraticmethod. net/how_to_use_the_socratic_method/using_the_socratic_method.html
 Schrijnemaekers AMC, Winkens I, Rasquin SMC, Verhaeg A, Ponds RWHM, Heugten VCM. Effectiveness and feasibility of socratic feedback to increase awareness of deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: Four single-case experimental design (sced) studies. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation an International Journal. 2018;30(4):1-22.
 Iqrammah E. Improving student’s critical thinking with a cooperative learning lodel using the socratic method on competency standards for drawing roof construction at SMK Negeri 3 jombang. Journal of Building Engineering Education Studies. 2015;1(1):70-76.
 Chaplin JP. Complete dictionary of psychology. PT RajaGrafindo Persada; 2002.
 Thompson RA. Counseling techniques. Routledge; 2003.
 Thomson J. Bullying, a parent’s guide. Need2know; 2011.
 DeLara EW. Bullying scars, the impact on adult life and relationships. Oxford University Press; 2016.
 Linasari T. The effectiveness of videotherapy in raising anti-bullying awareness in grade vs students. Journal of School Teacher Education Fundamental. 2016;36(5):3438-3448.
 Hazler RJ, Carney JV. Cultural variations in characteristics of effective bullying programs. Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective; 2019. p 417-430.
 Salmivalli C, Kaukiainen A, Voeten M. Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;75(3):465–487.
 Khairuntika K. Socrates method in developing student’s critical thinking skills. Paper presented at: National Conference on Mathematical Research and Learning; 16th November 2016, Surakarta, Indonesia, 2016;
 Dillon JJ. Teaching psychology and the socratic method, real knowledge in a virtual age. Springer Nature; 2016.
 Socratic method. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/ 4994?style=print
 Becirovic S, Delic H. Socratic method as an approach to teaching. European Researcher. 2016;11(10):511- 517.
 Nurjanah A, Suprapto N. The influence of the Socrates learning method on student’s rational thinking skills in learning physics at SMA muhammadiyah 2 surabaya. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 2004;3(2):20-26.
 Wulansari N, Yunarti T, Coesamin M. Application of the socratic method through a contextual approach to learning mathematics. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung. 2013;1(8):1-13.
 Narbuko C, Achmadi A. Research Methodology. Bumi Aksara; 2009.
 Moleong LJ. Qualitative research methods. Youth Rosdakarya; 2002.
 Marela G, Wahab A, Marchira CR. Verbal bullying causes depression in Yogyakarta city high school youth. Public Medical News. 2017;33(1):83–89.
 Turner I. Physical and verbal bullying behaviors in school students: Well-being, supportive school climate, and the social identity perspective. [Ph.D. dissertation]. College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University: Canberra; 2015.
 Son RB. The role of guidance and counseling teachers in overcoming delinquency in schools. Pedagogical Journal of Education. 2015;10(1):32-39.
 Khaliq I, Azzahra A, Safitri A, Muthmainnah RN. Efforts to improve student’s mathematical critical thinking power by using the contextual socrates method. Fibonacci Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education. 2017;3(1):23-30.
 Laksana BA. Minister of social affairs: 84% of children aged 12-17 years experience bullying. [Internet]. DetikNews, 21st July 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 15]. Available from: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3568407/ mensos-84-anak-usia-12-17-tahun-mengalami-bullying
 Ahmad EH. Cognitive-behavioral therapy to handle anger of bullying in schools. Indonesian Guidance and Counseling Journal. 2019;4(1):14-18.