Digital Literacy in the Post-Truth Era: Employing Fact-Checking Applications in Adult EFL Reading Classes

Abstract

The term ‘digital literacy’ encompasses many skills, which include the ability to evaluate information received through digital technologies, such as internet platforms, social media and mobile devices. Due to the fast spreading of hoax news through digital platforms in this post-truth era, it is urgently needed for this particular skill to be taught in educational settings, and English as a foreign language (EFL) classes are no exception. This study focused on exploring adult EFL students’ experiences in using two fact-checking applications (web-based apps) to help identify fake news in reading comprehension classes, and examining their efficacies from the students’ points of view. Employing a descriptive statistics approach, the researchers collected the data using an online survey administered to 130 students of a Science and Technology study programme at a university in Medan, Indonesia. The results indicated that in general students had positive attitudes toward the use of two fact-checking web-based apps. Specifically, they reported that the apps were very helpful in raising their awareness of digital literacy and fact-checking prior to reading and sharing digitally spread news. A closer look at the data reveals students’ preferences toward one of the two web-based apps. This study recommends the integration of anti-hoax education not only in EFL classes, but also in any other classes to prevent the threats of fake news, particularly to young generations.


Keywords: Digital literacy, fact-checking apps, fake news, hoax, post-truth era

References
[1] Corbel, C. and Gruba, P. (2004). Teaching Computer Literacy. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research Macquarie University.

[2] Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, issue 84, pp. 287-312.

[3] Fithriani, R. (2018). Discrimination Behind NEST and NNEST Dichotomy in ELT Professionalism. In 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, KnE Social Sciences, pp. 741–755.

[4] Flanagin, A. J. and Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, issue 77, pp. 515-540.

[5] Fogg, B., et al. (2001). What Makes Web Sites Credible?: A Report On A Large Quantitative Study. Presented at SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 61-68.

[6] Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: John Wiley

[7] Godwin-Jones, B. (2000). Emerging Technologies: Literacies and Technology Tools/Trends. Language Learning and Technology, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 10-16.

[8] Isman, A. and Gungoren, C. O. (2014). Digital Citizenship. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 73–77.

[9] Jones, C., et al. (2010). Net Generation or Digital Natives: Is there a Distinct New Generation Entering University? Computers & Education, vol. 54, issue 3, pp. 72–732.

[10] Leu, D. J., et al. (2008). Research on Instruction and Assessment in the New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension. In C. Collins-Block, S. Parris and P. Afferbach (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research Based Best Practices. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 321-346.

[11] Leu, D. J., et al. (2015). The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 50, issue 1, pp. 37–59.

[12] Metzger, M. J., et al. (2003). Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment. Communication Yearbook, issue 27, pp. 293-336.

[13] Ribble, M. S. and Bailey, G. D. (2007). Digital Citizenship in Schools. ISTE.

[14] Ribble, M. (2011). Digital Citizenship in schools ISTE & Eurospan. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 43, issue 6, pp. 10.

[15] Roche, T. B. (2017). Assessing the Role of Digital Literacy in English for Academic Purposes University Pathway Programs. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 71–87.

[16] Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.

[17] Son, J. B., Robb, T. and Charismiadji, I. (2011). Computer Literacy and Competency: A Survey of Indonesian Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. CALL-EJ, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 26-42.

[18] Spires, H. and Bartlett, M. (2012). Digital Literacies and Learning: Designing A Path Forward. NC State University

[19] Spires, H. and Estes, T. (2002). Reading in Web Based Learning Environments. In C. Collins Block and M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 115–125.

[20] Suharyanto, C. E. (2019). Analisis Berita Hoaks Di Era Post-Truth: Sebuah Review. Masyarakat Telematika & Informasi, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 37–49.