Digitalization As a Growth Factor of ˋˋSoft Power'' in the Context of Globalization


Digitalization as a new theoretical concept is actively used by researchers to evaluate economic, socio-political and other processes in a contemporary society. Digitalization, infiltrating the system of international relations, changes not only the principles of international communications, but also its tools. Peculiarities, risks, and prospects of digitalization in particular spheres and society as a whole, are actively explored in various branches of science, however, digitalization of economy, business processes, social institutions, society and humans remain priority issues. To analyze digitalization, academic science uses comparative and system analysis. In particular, to determine the tools that contribute to the growth of “soft power” in the digital society, secondary data analysis is used. In the context of digital transformation of the system of international relations, the scope and range of “soft power” tools are expanding. In addition, digitalization is adapting the tools of “soft power” to the modern system of international relations, so one of the important tools and factors in the growth of “soft power” becomes digital diplomacy. The authors of the article define “digital diplomacy” as a foreign policy instrument, which implies flexible forms of interaction between actors in international relations using new forms of mass communication and network technologies with the aim of influencing the world discourse on pressing issues, promoting national interests and producing an operational response to the latest information challenges. It has been established that the growth of the country’s “soft power” correlates with the introduction of digitalization tools, however, soft digital influence can lead to negative consequences, namely the appearance and mass distribution of fake news, manipulation of the global agenda, and digital inequality, inter alia. The development of objective criteria and methods for distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate digital instruments of “soft power” of a country is a further direction in the research of the phenomenon of “soft power” digitalization.

Keywords: digitalization, globalization, “soft power”, digital society, digital diplomacy

[1] Arkhipova, Z. V. (2016). Transformation of the Electronic Government into the Digital Government. Bulletin of Baikal State University, vol. 26, issue 5, pp. 818–824.

[2] Bunz, M. (2014). The Silent Revolution: How Digitalization Transforms Knowledge, Work, Journalism and Politics Without Making Too Much Noise. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 160.

[3] Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R. and LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, vol. 15, issue 2, pp. 78–96.

[4] Gallarotti, G. (2011). Soft Power: What it is, why it’s important, and the conditions under which it can be effectively used. Journal of Political Power, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 25–47.

[5] Gribovod, E. G. (2019). Digitization and its Impact on Political Media Space: Theoretical Aspect. In: Zaks, L. A, Semitko, A. P. and Mitsek, S. A, et al. (Eds.). Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific practical conference (with international participation), Liberal Arts University, University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, pp. 464–471.

[6] Khalin, V. G. and Chernova, G. V. (2018). Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Administrative Consulting, vol. 10, issue 118, pp. 46–63.

[7] Kosorukov, A. A. (2017). The Digital government in the practice of modern public administration (on the example of the Russian Federation). Trends and Management, vol. 4, pp. 81–96. Retrieved February 19, 2020 from

[8] Kovba, D. M. and Gribovod, E. G. (2019). International academic mobility through the prism of soft power theory. The Education and Science Journal, vol. 21, issue 10, pp. 9–31.

[9] Lebedeva, M. M. (2017). Soft power: the concept and approaches. MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 3, issue 54, pp. 212–223.

[10] Macek, A. and Ritonija, N. (2016). Virtual Mobility in Higher Education – The Case of DOBA Faculty. In T. J. Karlovitz (Ed.), Studies from Education and Society, International Research Institute, Komárno, Slovakia, pp. 98–106. Retrieved February 19, 2020 from

[11] Makhalin, V. N. and Makhalina, O. M. (2018). Management of calls and threats in digital economy of Russia. Upravlenie, vol. 6, issue 2, pp. 57–60.

[12] Manikovskaya, M. A. (2019). Digitalization of Education: Challenges to Traditional Norms and Moral Principles. Power and Administration in the East of Russia, vol. 2, issue 87, pp. 100–106.

[13] McClory, J. (2017). The Soft Power 30. A Global Ranking Soft Power 2017. Retrieved February 21, 2020 from

[14] McClory, J. (2019). The Soft Power 30. A Global Ranking Soft Power 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2020 from

[15] Nikulina, T. V. and Starichenko, E. B. (2018). Informatization and digitalization of education: concepts, technologies, management. Teacher Education in Russia, vol. 8, pp. 107–113.

[16] Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, p. 208.

[17] Otto, D. (2018). Using Virtual Mobility and Digital Storytelling in Blended Learning: Analysing Students’ Experiences. Turkish Internet Journal of Distance Education, vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 90–103.

[18] Petrova, L. E. and Kuz’min, K. V. (2015). Virtual academic mobility of students by means of МООСs: higher school methods of teaching. Pedagogical Education in Russia, vol. 12, pp. 177–182.

[19] Rusakova, O. F. and Gribovod, E. G. (2019). Information components of soft power: communicative aspects. International Trends, vol. 1, issue 56, pp. 62–72.

[20] Rusakova, O. F. and Gribovod, E. G. (2014). Some results of the First stage of International conference Soft Power: Theory, Resources, Discourse. Scientific journal, Discourse-P, vol. 4, issue 17, pp. 191–193.

[21] Rusakova, O., Kovba, D., Gribovod, E. and Popova, N. (2018). Cultural Diplomacy as the Intellectual Capital of Soft Power Exercised by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Member states. In: Shaun Pather (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning ICICKM 2018, University of the Western Cape South Africa, pp. 277-284.

[22] Volodenkov, S. V. (2018). Big data technologies in modern political processes: digital challenges and threat. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, vol. 44, pp. 205–212.