Religious Socialization in a High Modern Society
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of how religious identity and belonging to a religious community becomes a life strategy for socialization, and can help to overcome crises at different stages of life. The text presents an analysis of the autobiographies of those who made religiosity the basis of their way of life and a means of of self-determination. The methodological basis of the research is the combination of the theory of multiple modernities and the method of biographical interviews. Namely, we pay attention to the strategy of constructing religious identity. Sampling was carried out using a combination of reference sampling methods and ‘snowball’, since our previous experience has shown that this combination gives the best results in the study of hard-to-reach religious groups. In total, the sample included 30 respondents at the rate of three representatives of each denomination (Orthodox, Catholics, old believers, Buddhists, Jews) in each of the two cities. They were interviews (in person and on Skype), then the resulting transcripts were processed according to the methodology of the analysis of biographical narrative, described by T. Ingrata. The method of biographical interview removes the problem of psychological barrier in respondents when communicating on sensitive topics, as Hyde does not affect them directly. When planning the sample, we included major denominations represented in Russia — Orthodoxy, Catholicism, Buddhism and Judaism. This procedure allows identifying and describing strategies of behavior, as it is based on the comparison of biographical data of respondents with the ‘told life story’, that is, the consideration of subjective experience in comparison with the real socio-cultural context.
Keywords: religious conversion, life crisis, biography, biography method
References
[1] Kleinenberg, E. (2014). Going Solo. New Social Reality. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, p. 96.
[2] Puzanova, Z. V. (2008). Loneliness: Possibilities of Empirical Analysis. Bulletin of PFUR, Series ”Sociology”, issue 4, p.28-38
[3] Iq.hse.ru. ( June 2013). Retrieved March 11, 2018 from https://iq.hse.ru/news/177669802.html.,
[4] Litresp.ru. (February 2014). Retrieved March 11, 2018 from litresp.ru/chitat/ru/Д/dzhejmsuiljyam/mnogoobrazie-religioznogo-opita.
[5] Lofland, D. and Stark, R. (1965). Becoming the Savior of the World. American Sociological Review., vol. 34, issue 3, p. 863–874.
[6] Wohlrab-Sahr, M., Knoblauch, H. and Krech, V. (1998). Religiose Konversion. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag, p. 266.
[7] Heirich, M. (1977). Change of Heart. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, issue 3. p. 121-139.
[8] Wohlrab-Sahr, M., Knoblauch, H. and Krech, V. (1998). Religiose Konversion. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag, p. 266.
[9] Stromberg, P. (1998). Konversion und das Zentrum der moralischen Verantwortlichkeit. In M. WohlrabSahr and, H. Knoblauch and V. Krech (Eds.), Religiose Konversion. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag, pp. 48- 61.
[10] Socis.isras.ru. (September, 2009) Retrieved August 11, 2018 from http://socis.isras.ru/index. php?page_id=453&id=66.
[11] Puzanova, Z. V. (2009) Loneliness as a Subject of Empirical Analysis. Retrieved August 19, 2018 from http://jour.isras.ru/index.php/soc4m/article/view/38.
[12] Schütze, F. (2008). Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews. (Part II). INVITE Biographical Counselling in Rehabilitative Vocational Training. Further Educational Curriculum. EU Leonardoda Vinci Programme. 2008. London
[13] Snow, D. A. and Machalek, R. (1983). The Convert as a Social type. In R. Collins (Ed.), Sociological Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[14] Stromberg, P. (1998). Konversion und das Zentrum der moralischen Verantwortlichkeit, 1998. In M. Wohlrab-Sahr, H. Knoblauch, V. Krech (Eds.), Religiose Konversion. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag.
[15] Travisano, R. A. (1970). Alternation and Conversion as Qualitatively Different Transformations. G. P. Stone and H. A. Faberman (Eds.), Social Psychology through Symbolic Interaction. Waltham: Ginn-Blaisdell.
[16] Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing. Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. London: SAGE Publications, p. 398.
[17] Texts.news. (December 2014) Retrieved August 20, 2018 from http://texts.news/gendernayasotsiologiya-analiza/pro.