Public Policy in Digital Society
The objectives of the article are to consider new possibilities of controllability in the context of digitalization and the becoming of a society with new characteristics and development trends. In the twentieth century, under the influence of digitalization, new trends and development threats appeared in the world associated with a sharp increase in the complexity of social processes, the intensive development of information technologies and the network structure society formation, which caused many new forms of communication. Society gradually attempts to become an ‘adult’ in this upcoming digital world — we can see it by the quality characteristics of Generation Z. But it loses something very important. The society has already realized that it is necessary to revise the semantic accents of the “public administration” term, shifting them towards the term “controllability”. But how to do it whether it is necessary to do it? The author’s thoughts and conclusions are based on sociological studies over the past 7–8 years, including: a comprehensive study “Dialogue of power and society in Internet communications (2013–2015); Global Digital Overview. 2020 and All Internet statistics for 2020 — figures and trends in the world and in Russia; ”Analysis of Russian media and Russian-language social media”, using the Medialogy information system (2015–2020).
Keywords: Public Administration, Digital Society, digitalization, controllability, social network
 Acting Governor of Lipetsk Region plans to introduce KPI in rural administrations. (2018, October). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/ 3764386.
 Web-Canape.ru. (March 3, 2020). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from https://www.web-canape.ru/ business/internet-2020-globalnaya-statistika-i-trendy/.
 Association of Siberian and Far Eastern Cities. (2017, May). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from http: //asdg.ru/news/355456/.
 Bannykh, G. and Kostina S. (2019, July). The Information Technologies and the Features of Information Culture of Master’s Students in Russia and the UK: a Comparative Analysis 2019. Presented at Proceedings of the Middle-Term Conference RC04 Sociology of Education International Sociological Association (ISA). Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), pp. 464-472.
 Volgograd City Portal. (2018, March). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from http://cod34.ru/v-rossii/osnovuproryvnogo-razvitiya-rossii-sostavit-chelovecheskij-potencial 53087.html.
 Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 594.
 Web-Canape.ru. (March 3, 2020). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from https://www.web-canape.ru/files/ 352/global-digital-overview-j.png.
 Slover.cc. 2005. Retrieved February 20, 2020 https://slovar.cc/rus/efremova/193997.htm.
 Government session. (2018, July). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from http://government.ru/news/33138/.
 Grimov, O. A. (2019), Digital Reality: Social Ontology and Methodology of Empirical Study. Complexity. Mind. Postnonclassic, vol. 3, pp. 42-50, DOI: 10.12737/article_5dbaa8bf81fe27.51109106.
 Hassig, G. (1987). Angst vor dem Computer? Die Schweiz angesichts einer modernen Tehnologie. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt.
 Polit-gid.ru. (December 15, 2019). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from https://polit-gid.ru/37301vnovosibirske-oboznachili-perspektivy-cifrovizacii/.
 Karpova, D. N. (May 18-21 2017). Manifest and Latent Risks of Continuous Online-communication. Tomsk, Russia: In The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences International Conference. Tomsk: National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, pp. 356-362.
 Ponkin, I. V. (2013). General Theory of Public Administration: Selected Lectures. Moscow: International Institute of Public Administration and Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, p. 196.
 Reconceptualizing Governance, Discussion Paper 2. (1997). New York: United Nations, p. 93.
 FederalPress. (2015, July). Retrieved February 20, 2020 from http://fedpress.ru/news/specproject/ week_itogi/1438004604-itogi-nedeli-yuga-rossii-politseiskie-korruptsionery-podorozhaniesotsuslug-i-travlya-zhu.
 Shilova, V. A. (2015). Communicative Field of Management: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Moscow: Lotus, p. 204.
 Vasilenko, L. A. (2008). Internet in Informatization of Public Service of Russia (Sociological Aspects) (2nd ed.). Moscow: NAUKA.
 Vasilenko, L. A. (2014). The Formation and Implementation of Innovative Competencies by Public Servants in the Context of Globalization. Public Service, vol. 2, issue 88, pp. 42–45.
 Vasilenko, L. A., Kazantseva, O. A. and Tarasova, E. V. (2015). Models of Dialogue between the Authorities and Society in Internet Communications. Moscow: Tarasova, Prospect.
 Voevodina, E. V. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Strategic Challenges for the Labor Market. In A. V. Volobueva and N. A. Orekhovskaya (Eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Development of Artificial Intelligence. Collective Monograph. Moscow: Prometey Publishing House Limited Liability Company, pp. 171-189.
 Zotov, V. V. and Zotova, O. M. (2019, July). Information and Communication Competence: The Relationship of Concepts. Presented at Proceedings of the Middle-Term Conference RC04 Sociology of Education International Sociological Association (ISA), Moscow, Russia. In Culture and Education: Social Transformations and Multicultural Communication. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), p. 541-548.
 Yudina, E. N. and Zakharova, S. A. (2016). Social Networks of the Internet in the Context of the Theory of Auto-Train N. Luman. University Journal, vol. 10, pp. 254- 260.