Download fulltext HTML
Afifah, L. (2020). Digitalization on Studies by Millenials Researcher. KnE Social Sciences, 4(12), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i12.7604

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i12.7604

statistics

  • 229 Abstract Views
  • 542 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Lilis Afifah

    Lilis Afifah

    German Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Sep 2, 2020

Digitalization on Studies by Millenials Researcher

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Art, Design, Education and Cultural Studies / Pages 280–290

Abstract

Echo boomers or generation ME, better known as ‘Millennials’, are people whose daily activities are inseparable from the involvement of technological and information developments. The dependence of echo boomers on modern technology in every line of life is not necessarily parallel to their interest in conducting research on this subject. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a study that examines the involvement of digitalization in the research of millennial generations. The data sources used in this study were German Department students consisting of students of German study programs and Chinese study programs as well as thesis works produced by students from both study programs between 2015 and 2019. The research data was obtained through interviews and documentation, and the findings data analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that there were not many studies by students involving information technology. The role of digitalization is mostly found in research on the development of learning media, a small portion of which occurs in the application of teaching materials and learning media.


Keywords: digitalization, research, millenial generation

References
[1] Afifah, L. (2016). Dam, ich gewinne das Spiel. Proceeding Kongres Nasional VI Ikatan Guru Bahasa Jerman Indonesia. Malang: Bintang Sejahtera, pp. 85-89.

[2] Badke, W. B. (2012). Teaching Research Processes. Cambridge : Chandos Publishing, pp. 11.

[3] Ed. Ruth R. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. Barbour, Rosaline S. (2014). Introducing Qualitative Research – A Student’s Guide. London: Sage.

[4] Brown, P. and Keep, E. (2018). Rethinking the Race Between Education & Technology. Issues in Science and Technology. Fall 2018, vol 35, issues 1,pp 34-35.

[5] Cladis, A. E. (2018). A shifting paradigm: An evaluation of the pervasive effects of digital technologies on language expression, creativity, critical thinking, political discourse, and interactive processes of human communications. E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1–24.

[6] Crittenden, W. F., Biel, I. K. and Lovely, W. A. III. (2019). Embracing Digitalization: Student Learning and New Technologies. Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 5–14.

[7] Drisko, J. W. and Tina, M. (2016). Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[8] Hew, K. F. and Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student Participation in Online Discussions - Challenges, Solutions, and Future Research. Singapore: Springer.

[9] Kasali, R. (2017). Strawberry Generation. Jakarta: Mizan.

[10] Lofthus, L. and Silseth, K. (2019). Students choosing digital sources: Studying students’ information literacy in group work with tablets. E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1–17.

[11] Mawarni, S. and Muhtadi, A. (2017). Pengembangan Digital Book Interaktif Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif untuk Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 84-96.

[12] Noble, T. and McGrath, H. (2016). The Prosper School Pathways for Student Wellbeing, Policy and Practices. London: Springer.

[13] Skripsi, T. D., Artikel, M. dan Laporan, P. (2017). Panduan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah - Tugas Akhir. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

[14] Sugito, S. S. and Tohani, E. (2017). Evaluasi Proses Bimbingan Skripsi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Berdasar Perspektif Pembelajaran Orang Dewasa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 21, issue 2, pp. 228-239.