Deliberate Learning Of Second Language (L2) Vocabulary: Research-Based Guidelines
Abstract
This article is devoted to overviewing several current studies on L2 vocabulary learning, especially those aimed at investigating and exploring the ways in which deliberate vocabulary learning would be best facilitated, and thus would increase learning. It is argued that knowledge of vocabulary is fundamental in all language use, and becomes an essential part to master second language. A large amount of vocabulary is required to use English both receptively and productively: 8000 – 9000 word families needed in order to adequately comprehend a wide range of written discourse (Nation, 2006), and 2000 – 3000 word families required to get sufficient comprehension of spoken discourse (van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2012). Knowing a lexical item entails several aspects of word knowledge i.e., form, meaning, and use, each of which is further comprised of several sub-aspects of word knowledge. In addition, vocabulary learning is incremental in nature. Taken all these into account, there should be a component of deliberate vocabulary learning in language teaching, regardless of the preferred teaching methods being applied. Most importantly, deliberate learning of vocabulary should be intensively focused on lexical items which fall into both the new GSL word list (Brezina & Gablasova, 2015) and the new AWL word list (Coxhead, 2000). Finally, reviewing current studies on L2 vocabulary learning results in several research-based guidelines for deliberate or intentional vocabulary learning which are discussed throughout the rest of this article.
Keywords: vocabulary learning, vocabulary size, word knowledge, high-frequency words, academic words, deliberately-learning-vocabulary guidelines
References
[1] V. Brezina and D. Gablasova, “Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2015.
[2] R. Carter, Vocabulary, Applied linguistic perspectives, Routledge, Oxford, 2012.
[3] E. V. Clark, The Lexicon in acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
[4] A. Coxhead, “A new academic word list,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 213–232, 2000.
[5] N. C. Ellis, R. Simpson-Vlach, and C. Maynard, “Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 375–396, 2008.
[6] D. Gardner and M. Davies, “Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 339–359, 2007.
[7] D. Gardner and M. Davies, “A new academic vocabulary list,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 305–327, 2014.
[8] M. Garnier and N. Schmitt, “The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 645–666, 2015.
[9] R. Goulden, P. Nation, and J. Read, “How large can a receptive vocabulary be?” Applied Linguistics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–363, 1990.
[10] J. Harmer, “Essential teacher knowledge: Core concepts in English language teaching,” Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, 2012.
[11] M. Hu and I. S. P. Nation, “Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 403–430, 2000.
[12] B. Laufer and C. G. Ravenhorst-Kalovski, “Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2010.
[13] B. Laufer and K. Shmueli, “Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it?” RELC Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 89–108, 1997.
[14] D. Liu, “The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 671–700, 2003.
[15] D. Liu, “The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 661–688, 2011.
[16] R. Martinez and N. Schmitt, “A phrasal expressions list,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 299–320, 2012.
[17] H.-T. Min, “EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading,” Language Learning, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 73–115, 2008.
[18] I. S. P. Nation, “Learning Vocabulary in Another Language,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[19] I. S. P. Nation, “How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?” Canadian Modern Language Review, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 59–82, 2006.
[20] A. Pawley and H. F. Sydner, “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency,” in Language and communication, J. C. Richards and R. W. Schmitt, Eds., pp. 191–225, Longman, London, 1983.
[21] Priyono, “Towards a reduction of grammar teaching: A lexical analysis,” TEFLIN Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 88–102, 1999.
[22] J. C. Richards, “Word lists: Problems and prospects,” RELC Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 69–84, 1974.
[23] N. Schmitt, Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2010.
[24] R. Simpson and D. Mendis, “A corpus-based study of idioms in academic speech,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 419–441, 2003.
[25] H. Van Zeeland and N. Schmitt, “Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension?” Applied Linguistics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 457–479, 2013.
[26] M. West, A general service list of English words, Green and Co, London, Longman, 1953.
[27] H. G. Widdowson, Teaching language as communication, Oxford University Press, 1978.
[28] D. A. Wilkins, Linguistics in language teaching, Edward Arnold, London, 1972.
[29] C. Zimmerman, “Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 121–140, 1997.