The evidence on the existence of economies Of scale in local government units
The purpose of this paper is to empirically verify if the possible existence of scale economies actually supports the argument that municipal consolidation is needed in Slovenia. The major reform of local self-government in Slovenia was implemented in 1994, when the transformation of existing 58 »communal« municipalities was envisaged. From 1995 onwards, the number of municipalities increased to the current number of 212 municipalities. Consequently, the necessity to implement structural reforms of local self-government in Slovenia has been stressed. The arguments favoring municipal amalgamations stressed that country has become too fragmented and municipal amalgamation would enable the reduction of (administrative) costs, and increase efficiency as well as quality of services provided, indicating that technical aspects of local government operation are targeted. Following, technical efficiency of Slovenian municipalities is estimated with the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, in order to determine if (and which) municipalities are experiencing increasing returns to scale (i.e., scale economies). The results indicate that there is important scale efficiency component, and predominantly very small municipalities are experiencing economies of scale, but their number is relatively low. Therefore, one of the classical arguments for municipal amalgamation, achieving economies of scale, can only be applied at a limited scale. This does not imply that more extensive amalgamation is not warranted, but it demands that other arguments justifying municipal amalgamation should be presented.
Keywords: Local government, municipal consolidation, scale economies, DEA, Slovenia
 F. J. et. al. Arcelus, On the Efficiency of the Delivery of Municipal Services, Tech. Rep., Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona, 2007.
 A. D. Athanassopoulos and K. P. Triantis, Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities, INFOR, 36, no. 3, 66–83, (1998).
 T. Coelli, A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1.: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Armidale, University of New England, 1996.
 A. Cokert and A. Čokert, Teritorialni del reforme lokalne samouprave v Sloveniji. Dela, 24, 207–217, (2005).
 B. Geys, F. Heinemann, and A. Kalb, Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities, European Journal of Political Economy, 26, no. 2, 265–278, (2010).
 J. J. Krüger, A Monte Carlo study of old and new frontier methods for efficiency measurement, European Journal of Operational Research, 222, no. 1, 137–148, (2012).
 B. Kupec, Zdruevanje obcin? Virant je za, stroke previdna, Zdruevanje obcin? Virant je za, stroke previdna, (2013), http://www.finance.si.
 Local Self-Government Act, Official Gazette of RS, 94/2007, (2007).
 C. Lo Storto, Evaluating Technical Efficiency of Italian Major Municipalities: a Data Envelopment Analysis model, 8, 346–350, (2013).
 Financial Statements of Municipalities, Ministry of Finance of RS, (2015), http:// www.mf.gov.si.
 W. E. Oates, Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1972.
 P. Pestieau and H. Tulkens, Assessing and explaining the performance of public enterprises, Finanz Archiv, 50, no. 3, 293–323, (1993).
 J. Ruggiero and D. F. Vitaliano, Assessing the efficiency of public schools using data envelopment analysis and frontier regression, Contemporary Economic Policy, 17, no. 3, 321–331, (1999).
 SORS. , SI-Stat Data Portal. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, SI-Stat Data Portal. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, (2015), http://www.stat.si.
 L. Stastna and M. Gregor, Local Government Efficiency: Evidence from the Czech Municipalities, IES Working Paper no. 14, Institute of Economic Studies, (2011).
 for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision, AGPS„ Steering Committee, Canberra, 1997.
 H. Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, Norton, New York, 1992.