Benefit Incidence Analysis of Uninhatitable Houses Rehabilitation Program in Indonesia

Abstract

The Government of Indonesia has launched new social assistance program named the Uninhabitable Houses Rehabilitation Program (in Indonesian: Program Rumah Tidak Layak Huni). Uninhabitable Houses Rehabilitation program is a social assistance program that aims to restore social functioning and improve the quality of poor housing that is initially uninhabitable to be habitable. This study aims to evaluate the achievement of the Uninhabitable Houses Rehabilitation Program in Grobogan Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. Grobogan Regency has the highest number of uninhabitable houses compared to another regencies and cities in Central Java Province. The method used in this study is Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA). This model shows the distribution of public expenditure made by the government into different community groups based on the level of income, so that it is expected to explain the progression of the Uninhabitable Houses Rehabilitation program given by the government to the residents of Grobogan Regency. The results of this study indicate that the Uninhabitable Houses Rehabilitation program in Grobogan Regency is a progressive policy, because the benefits received by the poor are more than 10%, i.e. 12,12%.

References
[1] Aneta, A. (2010). Implementation of Urban Poverty Reduction Program (P2KP) Policy in Gorontalo City. Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 1, No.1.

[2] Central Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Profile of Indonesian Poverty. Taken from https://bps.do.id. (accessed on March 31, 2018).

[3] Central Java Province Central Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Poverty Line and Poor Population in Central Java. Taken from https://jateng.bps.go.id. (accessed on March 31, 2018).

[4] Cuenca, J. S. (2008). Benefit Incidence Analysis of Public Spending on Education in the Philipines: A Methodological Note. Philipines Institute For Development Studies.

[5] Demery, L. (2000). Benefit Incidence: a practitioner’s guide. The World Bank.

[6] Directorate General of Housing and Settlements. (2002). National Housing and Settlement Policies and Strategies. Jakarta.

[7] Guidelines for the General Social Assistance (Bansos) of Uninhabitable Houses in Central Java Province. (2017). Public Housing Agency and Settlement Area.

[8] Roebyantho, H., & Unayah, N. (2014). Implementation of Poverty Reduction Policy through Non-Livable House Social Rehabilitation Program (RTLH), in the City of Garut, West Java Province. Socio Conception. Vol. 4, No. 1.

[9] Setiowati, E. (2018). Factors driving the success of the Siak Regency Government in Poverty Reduction in Mempura Subdistrict, Siak Regency (Year 2011-2015). JOM FISIP, Vol. 5.

[10] Suradi. (2012). Impact Evaluation Study of Social Policy: Home Social Rehabilitation is Not Eligible for Families in Banjarmasin City. Socio-conception. Vol. 17, No. 2.

[11] Usman, C. (2014). Effectiveness of the Hope Family Program (PKH) in Poverty Reduction Framework (A Study in the North City District of Gorontalo City). Journal of Public Administration, Vo. 2, No. 1.