Download fulltext HTML
Ramadhani , M., & Handayati, Y. (2020). Application of Subcontractor Selection Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in Ritz Garment. KnE Social Sciences, 4(6), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6617

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6617

statistics

  • 416 Abstract Views
  • 378 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Muthia Ramadhani

    Muthia Ramadhani

    School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung - Indonesia
  • Yuanita Handayati

    Yuanita Handayati

    School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung - Indonesia

Published Date

  • Mar 23, 2020

Application of Subcontractor Selection Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in Ritz Garment

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Education 2019 / Pages 423–445

Abstract

This research was conducted in Ritz Garment to determine the level of importance of the criteria and sub-criteria that are used for subcontractor selection for Ritz Garment, assess the performance of current and alternative subcontractors, and provide recommendations for Ritz Garment based on the subcontractor selection. To determine the importance of the criteria and sub-criteria and also to score alternatives towards each of the sub-criteria, decision-makers which are the manager and owner of Ritz Garment are interviewed as respondents to get their expert judgment. The interview will generate pairwise comparison for each criterion and sub-criteria from each respondent that will be averaged using geometric mean to get the numbers that will be used to calculate the weight of each criteria and sub-criteria. From the result of this research that is conducted using AHP method with the Expert Choice software, level of importance for each criterion and alternatives are obtained. The order of importance of criteria is Quality (0.296), Cost (0.290), Reliability (0.273), Delivery (0.080), and Flexibility (0.061). The sequence for sub-criteria Global Weight is Defect Rate (0.156), Trustworthy (0.154), Internal Cost (0.153), Conformance Quality (0.140), Product Price (0.137), Product Reliability (0.119), Customization (0.051), Compliance with Quantity (0.045), Compliance with Schedule (0.035), and Product Volume Changes (0.010). For the alternatives, the order of importance is Alternative Subcontractor 1 (7.667), Alternative Subcontractor 2 (0.7.314), Alternative Subcontractor 3 (7.099) and Current Subcontractor (6.266). From the result, it is concluded that Alternative Subcontractor 1 is the best subcontractor to replace Current Subcontractor.


Keywords: garment industry, subcontractor selection, analytical hierarchy process, criteria, sub-criteria, best subcontractor, case study

References
[1] Kemenperin: Industri Tekstil Dan Produk Tekstil Di Revitalisasi. (2010). Retrieved from http://www. kemenperin.go.id/artikel/60/Industri-Tekstil-Dan-Produk-Tekstil-Di-Revitalisasi.

[2] Miranti, E. (2007). Mencermati kinerja tekstil indonesia: antara potensi dan peluang. Economic Review, 209, 1-10.

[3] Kuncoro, M. (2013). Indonesia’s textile and its products industry: Recent development and challenges. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED), 1(3).

[4] Kurniawan, I. (2013). Industri Tekstil Nasional Ingin Geser Dominasi India. Retrieved from http://www. neraca.co.id/article/30904/industri-tekstil-nasional-ingin-geser-dominasi-india.

[5] Sjaifudian, H., & Chotim, E. E. (1994). Dimensi strategis pengembangan usaha kecil: subkontrak pada industri garmen batik. Akatiga.

[6] Mehta, P., & Bhardwaj, S. (1998). Managing quality in the apparel industry. New Delhi: H.S. Poplai for New Age International (P) Ltd.

[7] Grondys, K., Kott, I., Sukiennik, K., & Seroka-Stolka, O. (2015). The Importance of Supplier Selection Process In Business Relationships.

[8] Su, J., & Gargeya, V. B. (2016). Supplier selection in small-and medium-sized firms: The case of the US textile and apparel industry. American Journal of Business, 31(4), 166-186.

[9] Santoso, D., & Besral, A. M. (2018). Supplier performance assessment using analytical hierarchy process method. Sinergi: Jurnal teknik mercu buana, 22(1), 37-44.

[10] Polat, G. (2016). Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), 1042-1054.

[11] Nowotarski, P., & Paslawski, J. (2015). Barriers in running construction SME–case study on introduction of agile methodology to electrical subcontractor. Procedia Engineering, 122, 47-56.

[12] Viarani, S. O., & Zadry, H. R. (2015). Analisis Pemilihan Pemasok dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process di Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 14(1), 55-70.

[13] Rochmoeljati, R. (2012). Pengukuran Kinerja Supplier Berdasarkan Vendor Performance Indicator Dengan Metode Quality Cost Delivery Flexibility Responsiveness. Jurnal Tekmapro, 1(2).

[14] Suciadi, Y. (2013). Pemilihan dan Evaluasi Pemasok Pada PT New Hope Jawa Timur dengan Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Calyptra, 2(1), 1-17.

[15] Sonmez, M. (2006). Review and critique of supplier selection process and practices. © Loughborough University.

[16] Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52-59.

[17] Teng, S. Gary, & Jaramillo, H. (2005). A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(7), 503-523.

[18] Bag, S. (2016). Service Supplier Selection using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 5(3), 9-16.

[19] Pal, S. S., & Singhi, R. (2015). Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Built Environment Industry with Analytic Hierarchy Process. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 47-63.

[20] Pal, S. S., Singhi, R., & Dinesh, R. (2016). Strategic Suppliers Selection Through AHP Model: A Case of an Indian Pharmaceutical Company. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(3), 54-71.

[21] Koç, E., & Burhan, H. A. (2014). An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to a Real World Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study of Carglass Turkey. Global Business & Management Research, 6(1), 1-14.

[22] Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2016). Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 326-354.

[23] Choudhury, D. K. (2016). Vendor Selection Model for a Manufacturing Company: An Analytical Research Approach. IUP Journal of Operations Management, 15(2), 34-52.

[24] Draginčić, J., & Vranešević, M. (2014). AHP-based group decision making approach to supplier selection of irrigation equipment. Water resources, 41(6), 782-791.

[25] Agarwal, P., Sahai, M., Mishra, V., Bag, M., & Singh, V. (2014). Supplier selection in dynamic environment using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 6(4), 20-26.

[26] Hadadian, A. R., & Rasoulian, A. (2017). Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Selecting the Appropriate Country for Economic Integration: Case of Iran’s Foreign Trade with OIC Countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 162, 24-32

[27] Rahmayanti, R. (2010). Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Studi Kasus Pada PT Cazikhal) (Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia). Retrieved from https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/12411/Analisis-pemilihan-supplier- menggunakan-metode-analytical-hierarchy-process-ahp-studi-kasus-pada-PT-Cazikhal.

[28] Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.