The Mediating Role of Individual Perception between Individual Orientation and Intention towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship
The negative effects of entrepreneurial activities on the environment should not be disregarded. Sustainable entrepreneurship has been recognized as a strategy in rectifying environmental issues through entrepreneurial activities. However, developing sustainable entrepreneurs is still in its infancy stage in Malaysia. Most of Malaysia’s small and medium enterprises (SMEs) still regard it as a new practice and not many of them have actually embarked on it. As such, this study investigated the formation process of intention towards sustainable entrepreneurship through individual orientation and individual perception. This study surveyed 404 SMEs owner-managers in Malaysia through self-administered questionnaires. The results indicated that individual orientation positively and significantly related to intention towards sustainable entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, the results also showed a significant partially mediating the role of individual perception between individual orientation and intention towards sustainable entrepreneurship. This study contributed to the literature by confirming that the formation process of intention towards sustainable entrepreneurship was successfully influenced by two important determinants, namely individual orientation, and individual perception. Practically, it highlighted some crucial factors in promoting sustainable entrepreneurship among SMEs in Malaysia.
Keywords: Entrepreneurship, intention, orientation, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), sustainability
 Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market Imperfections, Opportunity, and Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29-49.
 Dean, T.J. and McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a Theory of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Reducing Environmental Degradation through Entrepreneurial Action. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50-76.
 Koe, W.L. and Majid, I.A. (2013). Sustainable Entrepreneurship among Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 286-290.
 Omar,R.andSamuel,R.(2012).Ecological Concerns and Environmental Orientation amongst Malaysian Manufacturing Firms, in Proceedings of the 2012International Conference on Innovation, Management and Technology Research (ICIMTR 2012). Melaka, Malaysia.
 Racelis, A.D. (2014). Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Asia: A Proposed Theoretical Framework Based on Literature Review. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, vol. 2.
 Shepherd, D. A. and Patzelt, H. (2011). The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking “What is to be Sustained” With “What is to be Developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. January, pp. 137-163.
 Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
 Schlaegel, C., He, X. and Engle, R.L. (2013). The Direct and Indirect Influences of National Culture on Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Fourteen Nation Study. International Journal of Management, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 597-609.
 Bhalachandran,G.(2011).Kautilya’sModelofSustainableDevelopment.Humanomics,vol.27,no.1,pp. 41-52.
 Hofstede,G.(1980).Culture’sConsequences:InternationalDifferencesinWork-relatedValues.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
 Trompenaars, F. and Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (2nd edition). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
 Schick, H., Marxen, S. and Freimann, J. (2005). Sustainability in the Start-up Process, in Making Ecopreneurs: Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship (Schaper, M. editor), pp. 108-121. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
 Kuckertz, A. and Wagner, M. (2010). The Influence of Sustainability Orientation on Entrepreneurial Intentions: Investigating the Role of Business Experience. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 524-539.
 Wagner, M. (2011). Effects of Innovativeness and Long-term Orientation on Entrepreneurial Intention: A Comparison of Business and Engineering Students. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 300-313.
 Shapero, A. and Sokol, L. (1982). The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship, in The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (Kent, C.A., Sexton, D.L. and Vesper, K.H. editors), pp 72-90. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J.C. and Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (2005). Factors affecting Entrepreneurial Intention Levels, in Proceedings of the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
 Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D. and Carsrud, A.L. (2000). Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, pp. 411-432.
 Chuluunbaatar, E., Ottavia, Luh, D.B. and Kung, S.F. (2011). The Entrepreneurial Startup Process: The Role of Social Capital and The Social Economic Condition. Asian Academy of Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 43-71.
 Izquierdo, E. and Buelens, M. (2008). Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Influence of Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and Attitudes, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Internationalizing Entrepreneurship Education and Training, Ohio, USA.
 Yoo, B., Donthu, N. and Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s Five Dimensions of Cultural Values at the Individual Level: Development and Validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, vol. 23, pp. 193-210.
 Liñán, F. and Chen, Y.W. (2009). Development and Cross-cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. May, pp. 593-617.
 Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 30, pp. 607-610.
 Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategies, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173-1182.