The Students’ Lesson Plans in the In-Service Ppg-Elt Program
Abstract
In the Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru Dalam Jabatan (In-service PPG Program), as in other teacher training programs, lesson plans are a prerequisite for peer teaching. In this program, seven out of 17 sessions are allotted for lesson plan writing, finalization, presentation, discussion, and revision. This arrangement is meant to enable the PPG students to develop lesson plans, discuss them with their facilitators and fellow students, get feedbacks, and improve them. At the end of this process, the students are expected to produce acceptable and feasible lesson plans. Do the students fulfil this expectation? To answer this question, all the components of their lesson plans are analyzed. The analysis focuses on the lesson plans the students prepared for high school level.
Keywords: lesson plan, in-service, PPG, ELT
References
[1] Brown, H.D. 2004. Language Assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
[2] Cavanagh, S. 1997. Content Analysis: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Nurse Researcher, 4, 5-13. From http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr1997.04.4.3.5.c5869
[3] Ernawati & Safitri, R. 2017. Analisis Kesulitan Guru Dalam Merancang Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Fisika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 Di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education) Vol.5, No.2, hlm. 49-56, 2017. From http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/jpsi.
[4] Krisdiana, I., Apriandi, D, dan Setiansyah, R.K. 2015. Analisis Kesulitan Guru dan Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika,1(1):143-154. From http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/jipm/article/view/492
[5] Kustijono, R. dan Wiwin, E. 2014. Pandangan Guru terhadap Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Fisika SMK di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 4(1):1-14. From https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa/article/view/180
[6] Model Pengembangan RPP. 2016. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
[7] Modul Guru Pembelajar. 2016. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
[8] Permendikbud Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter
[9] Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
[10] Permendikbud Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar
[11] Rink, J.E. 2009. Designing Physical Education Curriculum for a Physically Active Lifestyle. (Online), (http://works.bepress.com/judith_rink/6/), accessed on 1 October 2019.
[12] Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. (Online), (https: //www.researchgate.net > profile > post > attachment > download > Sc...), accessed on 26 September 2019.
[13] Sidiq, F. 2015. Analisis Kesiapan Guru dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di MIN Se-Kota Banda Aceh. Tesis tidak dipublikasikan. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Unimed. (Online), (http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/ 1491/), accessed on 30 September 2019.
[14] Tomlinson, B. 2010. Principles and procedures of materials development. In N. Harwood (ed.) Materials in ELT: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[15] Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2014 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi
[16] Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Guru dan Dosen