Word Association and Its Function at the Constituent Understanding on the Language Learning


This paper aimed at describing word association and its function at the constituent understanding on the language learning. Word association is a relation between a word with other words because of the semantic relationship. A word association test appears when there is a stimulus word and someone mentions a response word that comes to mind firstly based on the stimulus word. The response words show someone’s mental lexicon as a result of language acquisition and language learning. Word associations can be used in the process of understanding constituents (linguistic units) with word association tests, they are (1) words, (2) phrases, and (3) sentence patterns. In word constituent learning, word association tests are carried out by asking questions so that the result can show the semantic networks of words that are classified by word type. Phrase constituent learning is also held by asking questions, but response words are included before or after the stimulus word so that these words form a phrase. Meanwhile, sentence constituent learning is held by presenting words that are located as predicate and then asking questions that bring up the subject, object, complement, or additional information that accompany the predicate. With this method, students do not only learn constituents as units that have levels from small (words) to large ones (sentences), but also understand that constituents have a patterned and interconnected system.


Keywords: word associations, constituents, language learning

[1] Bahar, M., & Hansell, M. H. 2000. The Relationship between Some Psychological Factors and Their Effect on the Performance of Grid Questions and Word Association Tests. Educational Psychology, 20
(3), 349–364. doi: 10.1080/713663739

[2] Bauer, Laurie. 2008. English Exocentric Compound. Dany Amiot (ed). La Composition Dans Une Perspective Typologique page. 35-47. Arras: Artois Presses Université.

[3] Bucklin, C. J., & Daniel, K. L. 2017. Using Word Associations as a Formative Assessment for Understanding Phylogenetics. The American Biology Teacher, 79(8), 668–670. https://abt.ucpress. edu/content/79/8/668.abstract

[4] Fernandez, Eva M. dan Cairns, Helen Smith. 2011. Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.

[5] Fisher, C. 2002. The Role of Abstract Syntactic Knowledge in Language Acquisition: A Reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82(3), 259-278.

[6] Fraser, A., Schmid, H., Farkas, R., Wang, R., & Schütze, H. 2013. Knowledge Sources for Constituent Parsing of German, A Morphologically Rich and Less-Configurational Language. Computational Linguistics, 39(1), 57-85.

[7] Istifçi, Ilknur. 2010. Playing With Words: A Study on Word Association Responses. Uluslararas Sosyal Arast rmalar Dergisi (The Journal of International Social Research). Volume 3 (10): 360-368. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt3/sayi10pdf/istifci_ilknur.pdf

[8] Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Meara, Paul M. 2009. Connected Words: Word Associations and Second Language Vocabulary

Acquisition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

[10] Pallier, C., Devauchelle, A.-D., & Dehaene, S. 2011. Cortical Representation of The Constituent Structure of Sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(6), page 2522–2527. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018711108

[11] Playfoot, D., Balint, T., Pandya, V., Parkes, A., Peters, M., & Richards, S. 2018. Are Word Association Responses Really the First Words that Come to Mind? Applied Linguistics Vol. 39 (5): 607-624. doi:10.1093/applin/amw015

[12] Rambow, Owen. 2010. The Simple Truth about Dependency and Phrase Structure Representations: An Opinion Piece. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Los Angeles, California pages 337–340.

[13] Rapp, R. 2014. Using Word Familiarities and word associations to Measure Corpus Representativeness. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2014), Reykjavik, Iceland, page. 2029–2036.

[14] Sneddon, J. N. et. al. 2010. Indonesian: A Reference Grammar 2nd Edition. Sydney: Allen & Unwin

[15] Sukartiningsih, Wahyu. 2010. Konstruksi Semantis Kata pada Perkembangan Bahasa Indonesia Anak. Bahasa dan Seni, Vol. 38 (2): 205-216.