Humor As a Means of Manipulating a Social Group’s Opinion in Modern Online Communities (A Case-Study on ‘the Houses of’ 2ch and Pikabu)
The Internet is a communication space where newly formed communities are searching for ways to reflect on their social nature. We provide a theoretical framework to demonstrate how humor was used to manipulate social groups before and after the emergence of the media. We use Critical Discourse Analysis and pragmatics to study several cases of social manipulation through humor. The two Internet communities, 2ch and Pikabu, being among the largest Russian-speaking entertainment communities, often compete and use humor as a way to manipulate their representatives for social purposes: to consolidate, fight back, reflect on the norms and values of their community. Our research shows that these communities follow the old traditions of humor and laughter in order to organize a poorly regulated information space. Although 2chers tend to use trolling more often, there is no general difference between these communities in the way they use humor to manipulate their social group.
Keywords: humor, laughter, Internet, social cognition, Critical Discourse Analysis, pragmatics, speech act
 Mikhalkova, E. V. (2009). Pragmatika i semantika invektivy v massmedijnom diskurse: na materiale russkih i amerikanskih komedijnyh teleshou. [Pragmatics and Semantics of Invective in Mass Media Discourse: Based on the Russian and American Comic TV-Shows]. Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Philology, Tyumen State University. (in Russian).
 Frolov, S. S. (2001). Sociologija organizacij. [Sociology of Organizations]: a student’s guide. Moscow: Gardariki.
 Cicero, M. T. (1860). On oratory and orators. New York: Harper & Brothers.
 Aristotle. (1922). The Poetics. London: Macmillan.
 Cooper, L. and Aristotle. (1922). An Aristotelian theory of comedy: with an adaptation of the Poetics, and a translation of the ”Tractatus Coislinianus”. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
 Lutz, C. E. (1954). Democritus and Heraclitus. The Classical Journal, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 309–314.
 Santangelo, P. (2012). Talking of smile and laughter, in Laughing in Chinese, 335–367. Rome: ARACNE editrice.
 Moheb, A. A. (2018). Smile and Laughter in the Sanskrit Literature and Indian Religious Art. Journal of religious studies, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 29–50.
 Pfister, R. (2012). Attitudes towards laughter and euphoria in medieval Chinese Daoist texts, in Laughing in Chinese, 335–367. Rome: ARACNE editrice.
 Hansen, M. H. (1995). Kome. A study in how the Greeks designated and classified settlements which were not poleis, in Law, Justice and the State: Proceedings of the 16th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
 Freidenberg, O. M. (1997). Pojetika sjuzheta i zhanra [The Poetics of Plot and Genre]. Moscow: Labirint. (in Russian).
 Huizinga, J. (2014). Homo Ludens. Abingdon: Routledge.
 Gurevich, E. A. (2007). Zhanr ”prjadej ob islandcah” v drevneskandinavskoj literature: k probleme istoricheskoj pojetiki maloj prozaicheskoj formy. [The Genre of ”Stories about Icelanders” in the Old Norse Literature: on the Problem of Historical Poetics of a Short Prosaic Form]. Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philology, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of RAS. Moscow. (in Russian).
 Levi-Strauss, C. (1983). Mythologiques. Vol. 1. Raw and the Cooked. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 Martineau, W. (2013). A model of the social functions of humor. In: The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. New York: Academic Press.
 Bakhtin, M. M. (2014). Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul’tura srednevekov’ja i Renessansa. [Rabelais and His World]. Moscow: Eksmo. (in Russian).
 Kristeva, J. (1969). Le mot, le dialogue et le roman. In: Σημειωτική: Recherches pour une sémanalyse, 70–99. Paris: Editiones du Seuil. [Quoted after: Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In: The Kristeva Reader, 34–61. New York: Columbia University Press.]
 Stebbins, R. A. (1990). Laugh-Makers: Stand-Up Comedy as Art, Business, and Life-Style. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
 Beville, H. M. Jr. (1940). The ABCD’s of radio audiences. Public Opinion Quarterly. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 195–206.
 McFadden, M. T. (1993). ”America’s Boy Friend Who Can’t Get a Date”: Gender, Race, and the Cultural Work of the Jack Benny Program, 1932–1946. In: The Journal of American History, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 113–134.
 Mintz, L. (1998). Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation. In: What’s So Funny?: Humor in American Culture. Wilmington: Rowman & Littlefield.
 Marc, D. (1996). Demographic Vistas: Television in American Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
 Smith, J. (2008). Vocal Tracks: Performance and Sound Media. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
 Black, L. and Forro, D. (1999). Humor in the academic library: You must be joking! or, How many academic librarians does it take to change a lightbulb? College and Research Libraries, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 165–172.
 Baumgartner, J. C. (2007). Humor on the next frontier: youth, online political humor, and the jibjab effect. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 319–338.
 Davison, P. (2012). The language of Internet memes. The Social Media Reader, pp. 120–134.
 Ellis, B. (2001). A model for collecting and interpreting World Trade Center disaster jokes, New Directions in Folklore. 5 October. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.954.6845&rep= rep1&type=pdf
 Fahlman, S. E. (2012). Smiley lore:-). Scott E. Fahlman’s Homepage. URL: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef /sefSmiley.htm
 Phillips, W. (2015). This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 Ivanov, A.G., Mikhalkova, E. V. and Shkolenko, A. S. (2012). Terminologicheskoe obosnovanie ponjatij «ideja», «cennost’», «norma» v kriticheskom diskurs-analize. [Terminological rationale of using the notions “idea”, “value”, “norm” in Critical Discourse Analysis]. Tyumen State University Herald: Humanitates. Philosophy, no. 10, pp. 101–105. (in Russian).
 Mikhalkova, E. V. and Kulchitsky, D. M. (2012). Tipologija priznakov social’noj gruppy dlja sistemy avtomaticheskogo poiska informacii o social’no aktivnyh molodezhnyh soobshhestvah. [A typology of characteristic features of a social group for a system of information retrieval regarding socially active youth communities]. In Inzhenerija znanij i tehnologii semanticheskogo veba [Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web]. Saint-Petersburg: ITMO University. (in Russian).
 Dijk, T. A., van. (1998). Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
 Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In Perspectives in the philosophy of language: a concise anthology, 253–268. Toronto: Broadview Press Calgary.
 Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (2003). Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
 Kirshenblatt-Gimblet, B. (1996). The Electronic Vernacular. In Connected: Engagements with Media, 21–66. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.