Gamification of Violence in Analog (Tabletop) Thematic Games: Splices, Wrinkles, and Translation Gaps

Abstract

Modern tabletop (analog) games are riding a wave of popularity being a part of "resisting the digital” trend. First of all, imaginary worlds of media franchises become represented in tabletop games with their specific ways of creating interactive narrative and gaming algorithms. Secondly, tabletop games address complicated issues and concepts of today’s world. The authors aim to examine specific ways of representing violence in tabletop games, with plots already employed by pieces of different types of media. The authors believe that the hybrid nature of modern tabletop (analog) games involves a hybrid methodology, including phenomenology, hermeneutics, procedural rhetoric, the ideas of R.Kayua, M.Wolf, L.Manovich. The concept of violence is analyzed with reference to V. Podoroga, А. Usmanova, S. Zizek, V. Benjamin. The result of the study is a comprehensive description of the representation of violence in board-themed games. The authors argue that violence is represented in tabletop games at several levels and in different forms: narrative violence, visual violence, symbolic violence, etc. The study indirectly confirms the non-autonomy of the game process, the dependence of the game narrative on the experience of acquaintance with the "imaginary world.”


Keywords: media theory, game studiеs, boardgames, tabletop games, violence

References
[1] Bakke, H.-Y. (2019). Samorefleksirujushhij simuljakr: Vizual’nost’ kak metakommentarij. (Self-reflexive Simulacra: Visuality as Meta-commentary). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, vol. 158 (4/2019). URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/158_nlo_4_2019/article/21376/. (in Russian)

[2] Wolf, Mark J. P. (2012). Building imaginary worlds: the theory and history of subcreation. New York, NY: Routledge.

[3] Donovan, T. (2017). It’s All a Game. The History of Board Games from Monopoly to Sattlers of Cattan. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books.

[4] Manovich, L. (2018). Jazyk novyh media. (The Language of New Media). Moskva: Ad marginem press. (in Russian).

[5] Murray, Janet H. (1997) Hamlet on the Holodek. The Future of Narrative in Cybespace. New York, NY: Free Press.

[6] Jampol’skij, M. (2014). Ot bytija k instrumental’nosti. Nasilie vhodit v mir. Posleslovie k knige Arendt H. o nasilii. (From Being to Instrumentality. On Violence Entering the World. Afterword to “On Violence” by Arendt, H.). Moskva: Novoe izdatelstvo. (in Russian).

[7] Usmanova, A. (2007). Nasilie kak kul’turnaja metafora (vmesto vvedenija). (Violence as Cultural Metaphor (introductory essay). Vizual’noe (kak) nasilie. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Vil’njus: EGU. (in Russian).

[8] Zhizhek, S. (2010). O nasilii. (Violence). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Evropa». (in Russian).

[9] Podoroga, V. (2016). Nasilie v sovremennom kinematografe (Podhod k teme). (Violence in Modern Cinema (Approaches to the Subject). Politicheskaja konceptologija, vol. 1.(in Russian).

[10] Kajua, R. (2007). Igry i ljudi. Stat’i i jesse po sociologii kul’tury. (Man, Play and Games). Moskva: OGI. (in Russian).

[11] Gadamer, G. G. (1991). Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo. (The Relevance of the Beautiful). Moskva: Iskusstvo. (in Russian).

[12] Arendt, H. (2014). O nasilii. (On Violence). Moskva: Novoe izdatelstvo. (in Russian).