Public Opinion Leaders Designing in Modern Neo-Information Society


The article discusses the mechanisms of building public opinion leaders in modern neo-information society. A number of methods were applied: a study of the authors using the focus group method ‘Bloggers=influencers?’ (n=10); secondary analysis of the sociological research of the ZIRCON research group in a personal interview “The image of a journalist in the mass consciousness of Russians” (n=1604); a framework analysis of the construction of hype as a social phenomenon in media discourse; authors’ research using the case study method “The phenomenon of Diana Shurygina.” Chronological scope of the study: 2017-2019. It is concluded that the strengthening of the actors of the blogging institution in the media was made possible as a result of a “crisis of confidence” in “traditional” media, in particular television, with a politicized media agenda leading to the acquisition of a propaganda vector, defining thereby the trend of piarisation the media. Being the influencers (mainly for the younger generation, which is exceptionally loyal), bloggers affect the building of a system of norms, values and attitudes of their audience. At the same time, the functioning of bloggers as leaders of public opinion contributes to the inspiration of marketing strategies: the sale of various goods and services through local advertising and product placement, the so-called influential marketing. In addition, by creating social phenomena such as hype, bloggers become drivers of hyponomics (or the economy of hype).

Keywords: leader of public opinion, influencing, media, blogging, hype, hyponomics

[1] Yudina, E. N. (2008). The development of the media space of modern Russia (on the example of television). (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Moscow State University, Russia.

[2] Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1948). The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.

[3] Shelonaev, S. I. (2011). Media space: the structure and distribution of social capital of media agents. Society. Environment. Development, no. 4, pp. 81–85.

[4] Volodenkov, S. V. (2016). From the information to communication: communication technologies under the conditions of a modern post-information society. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, no. 4, pp. 4–13.

[5] Shelonaev, S. I. (2015). Evolution and prospects of the Russian media space. Modern Mass Media in the Context of Information Technologies, in Proceedings of the First All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technology and Design.

[6] Tomin, V. V., Sakharova, N. S., Eremina, N. V., et al. (2016). Intercultural adaptation of students in the information field of cross-cultural interaction. Global Media Journal, vol. S2:7, pp. 1–10.

[7] Bloomer, G. (1984). Society as a Symbolic Interaction. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow State University. [8] Yefanov, A. A. (2018). The phenomenon of media piarisation. Communicology, no. 6, pp. 34–40.

[9] Safonov, A. V. (2007). ‘Political theater’ as a factor in the formation of social values. Media Environment, no. 2, pp. 130–140.

[10] Yefanov, A. A. (2018). Falling confidence in television: a sociological view of the problem. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Social Sciences and Humanities, no. 2, pp. 89–94.

[11] Korochensky, A.P. (2015). World journalism: history, theory, practice: a collection of scientific and journalistic works. Belgorod: Publishing House ‘Belgorod.’

[12] Serebryakova, Z. O. (2017). The phenomenon of de-institutionalization of modern Russian journalism as a subject of sociological research. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Nizhny Novgorod State University.

[13] Means of the mass distrust. The Media Standard Foundation has studied the attitude of Russians to the work of journalists. (2019). Retrieved July 2, 2019, from 5bcc97729a7947e625fc02ba

[14] Tomin, V. V., Bochkareva, T. S., Bogomolova, A. Yu., et al. (2017). Culturological and axiological issues of students’ cross-cultural interaction in the information field. Man in India, vol. 97, no. 25, pp. 263–283.

[15] Russian blogger: what you need to know about working with the opinion leaders. (2019). Retrieved July 4, 2019, from s-liderami-mneniy

[16] Instagram Influencer Marketing is a 1.7 Billion Dollar Industry. (2019). Retrieved July 4, 2019, from

[17] PR Under the Influence: Why Influencer Marketing is all the Buzz. (2019). Retrieved July 4, 2019, from

[18] Peers Have Influence Over Consumers, Celebrities Don’t. (2019). Retrieved July 4, 2019, from https: //

[19] Malchikov, D. K. (2017). Non-standard investment: HYIP, start-up stock exchanges. New Science: Current Status and Development Paths, no. 10, pp. 219–222.

[20] Kolesnik, M.V. (2017). The phenomenon of air selling in the context of modernity. The youth of the third millennium, in Collection of scientific articles, 374-378. Moscow: EXPO.

[21] Rushkoff, D. (2003). Media Virus. How pop culture secretly affects your consciousness. Moscow: Ultra- Culture. [22] Yefanov, A. A. (2018). ‘Hypes’ in the present media field. Sign: The Problem Field of Media Education, no. 1 (27), pp. 63–69.

[23] Kiouru, K.V. (2019). The message in the new media environment as a response to the technological possibilities of modern communications: hype, flogging, sock puppet, in Journalistic Text in a New Technological Environment: Achievements and Challenges. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University.

[24] Baudrillard, J. (2006). Consumer Society. Its myths and structure. Moscow: The Cultural Revolution.

[25] Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.

[26] Shurygina became the leader of search queries. (2017). Retrieved March 8, 2017, from

[27] Diana Shurygina will appear in the 4th and 5th issue of the Let They Talk program. (2017). Retrieved March 8, 2017, from