The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives on Rural Community Development: The Case of TITAN – Sharrcem in Kosovo
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become an integral part of firms’ strategies in their effort to increase their positive impact on society. This study investigates the impact of a CSR initiative, known as “The LAB Project”, implemented by the TITAN– Sharrcem Company, on the rural community of Hani I Elezit in Kosovo. The LAB project aims to support the establishment and operation of agricultural and food-related start-ups and, most importantly, to ensure their sustainability. The sample of the study consists of 174 area residents. This research examines local residents’ perceptions about a) the TITAN-Sharrcem operations in the area, b) the LAB project’s main contribution to the local community, c) the project’s overall performance, d) the profitability of the start-ups created by the project, and e) the project’s effect on the community’s quality of life. Overall, the results reveal that the project has set the foundation for the community’s sustainable development. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research on the effect of such initiatives in the region.
Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Rural Entrepreneurship, Community Development
References
[1] Jones, P., Comfort, D. & Hillier, D. (2007). Marketing and corporate social responsibility within food stores. British Food Journal, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 582–593.
[2] Badulescu, A., Badulescu, D., Saveanu, T. & Hatos, R. (2018). The Relationship between Firm Size and Age, and Its Social Responsibility Actions-Focus on a Developing Country (Romania). Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 805.
[3] Rangan, K., Chase, L. A. & Karim, S. (2012). Why Every Company Needs a CSR Strategy and How to Build It. Harvard Business School, Working Paper no. 12-088, pp. 1–31.
[4] Chapple, W. & Moon, K. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: a seven-country study on CSR web site reporting”, Business and Society, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 415–441.
[5] Anon, n.d, ’Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development’ [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa. eu/europeaid/communication-commission-concerning-corporate-social-responsibility-business- contribution_en [Accessed on July 2019].
[6] Isa, S. M. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility: What can we Learn from the Stakeholders? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. vol. 65 (ICIBSoS), pp. 327–337, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.130.
[7] Spence, L. & Bourlakis, M. (2009). The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 291–302.
[8] D’Astous, A. & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding Consumers’ Ethical Justifications: A Scale or Appraising Consumers’ Reasons for Not Behaving Ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 255–268.
[9] Abdolvand, M. & Charsetad, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and brand equity in industrial marketing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 273–284.
[10] Fatma, M., Rahman, Z. & Khan, I. (2015). Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: the mediating role of trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 840–856.
[11] Friedrich, N., Heyder, M. & Theuvsen, L. (2012). Sustainability management in agribusiness: Challenges, concepts, responsibilities and performance, in Proceedings of the 6th International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, International Center for Food Chain and Network Research, University of Bonn, Germany, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria (No. 1020-2016- 81734, p. 530).
[12] Moravcikova, K., Stefanikova, Ľ. & Rypakova, M. (2015). CSR Reporting as an Important Tool of CSR Communication. Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 332–338.
[13] Locke, R. M. (2002). The promise and perils of globalization: The case of Nike. Industrial Performance Center, ( July), pp. 1–36. doi: 10.1108/13598540710759745.
[14] Harrison, A. & Scorse, J. (2004). The Nike effect: Anti-sweatshop activists and labor market outcomes in Indonesia. UC Berkeley, (March), pp. 1–48. Available at: http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/ files/Workshops-Seminars/Development/harrison-040322.pdf.
[15] Šontaitė-Petkevičienė, M. (2015). CSR Reasons, Practices and Impact to Corporate Reputation. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 213, pp. 503–508.
[16] Banerjee, S. B. (2014). A critical perspective on corporate social responsibility: Towards a global governance framework. Critical Perspectives on International Business, vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 84–95.
[17] Eliasson, M. & Smajovic, S. (2009). CSR Communication & SMEs. Master Thesis within Entrepreneurship, Management & Marketing, Jonkoping International Business School, pp. 6–47.
[18] Anon, n.d, ’TITAN Integrated Annual Report 2018’ [Online] Available at: http://integratedreport2018. titan.gr/ [Accessed on June 2019],
[19] Anon., n.d, ’Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2013’, TITAN - Sharrcem, [Online] Available at: http://sharrcem.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/CSR-Report-2013-English.pdf [Accessed on April 2018].
[20] Vergos, V. & Shabanaj, H. (2017). Sustainable Community Development through Innovative Entrepreneurial Actions. [online] Esee2017.maich.gr. Available at: http://esee2017.maich.gr/uploads/ attachments/58/Vergos Shabanaj.pdf [Accessed on June 2019].
[21] Anon., n.d, ’Kosovo Agency of Statistics’ 2016 & 2017, ask, [Online] Available at: http://ask.rks-gov.net/ en/kosovo-agency-of-statistics/economy [Accessed on April 2018].
[22] Anon., n.d, ’Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2014’ TITAN - Sharrcem, [Online] Available at: http://sharrcem.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Sharrcem-CSR-Report-2014-ENGLISH. pdf [Accessed on April 2018].
[23] Kepore, K. P. & Imbun, B. Y. (2011). Mining and stakeholder engagement discourse in a Papua New Guinea mine. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 220– 233.
[24] Anon., n.d, ’Project - Laboratory for Business Activities’ Report May - November 2014.
[25] Anon., n.d, ’Project - Laboratory for Business Activities’ Report January - December 2018.
[26] Anon., n.d, ’Project - Laboratory for Business Activities’ Report January - December 2015.
[27] Anon., n.d, ’Project - Laboratory for Business Activities’ Report January - December 2016.
[28] Anon., n.d, ’Project - Laboratory for Business Activities’ Report January - December 2017.
[29] Ismail, M., Alias, S. N. & Mohd Rasdi, R. (2015). Community as stakeholder of the corporate social responsibility programme in Malaysia: outcomes in community development. Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 109–130.
[30] Wisdom, J. P., Cavaleri, M. A., Onwvuegbuzie, A. J. & Green A. (2011). Methodological Reporting in Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Health Services Research Articles. Health Services Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 721–745.
[31] Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, 3rd edition, Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
[32] Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 311– 325.
[33] Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, 3rd edition, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
[34] Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S. & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 396–403.
[35] Anon., n.d, ’City population of Hani I Elezit, Kosovo’ [Online] Available at: http://www.citypopulation. info/php/kosovo-admin.php?adm2id=33[Accessed on April 2018].
[36] Haug, H. K. (2015). Gender equality and inequality in Kosovo, in Gender (In) equality and Gender Politics in Southeastern Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 147–168.
[37] Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 347–373.
[38] Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–73.
[39] Idemudia, U. (2007). Community perceptions and expectations: reinventing the wheels of corporate social responsibility practices in the Nigerian oil industry. Business and Society Review, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 369–405.
[40] Gilberthorpe, E. & Banks, G. (2012). Development on whose terms?: CSR discourse and social realities in Papua New Guinea’s extractive industries sector. Resources Policy, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 185-193.
[41] McLennan, S. & Banks, G. (2019). Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 117–126.
[42] Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits?: The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New York, Psychology Press.