Architectural Design Optimization—Results from a User Survey
Although there is a substantial body of academic literature on Architectural Design Optimization (ADO), not much is known about actual ADO practices. This paper presents results from a user study of ADO in Grasshopper and compares them with previous studies. Compared to these studies, this anonymous, web-based survey employed a more relevant sample in that all eighteen respondents actually use ADO and in that they represent a mix of students, academics,and professionals.The survey's results highlight the importance of supporting meaningful selections from and better understandings of optimization results and question the ADO literatures’ emphasis on evolutionary, multi-objective optimization algorithms. They thus guide future research and development on ADO tools and ultimately contribute to the design of a more resource- and energy-efﬁcient built environment.
 Asl, M.R., Stoupine, A., Zarrinmehr, S. and Yan, W. 2015. Optimo: A BIM-based Multi-Objective Optimization Tool. Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference (Vienna, AUT, 2015), 673–682.
 Attia,S.,Hamdy,M.,O’Brien,W.andCarlucci,S.2013.Assessinggapsandneedsforintegratingbuilding performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design. Energy and Buildings. 60, (May 2013), 110–124.
 Bradner, E., Iorio, F. and Davis, M. 2014. Parameters tell the design story: ideation and abstraction in design optimization. Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (2014).
 Cichocka, J.M., Rodriguez, E. and Browne, W.N. 2017. Optimization in the Architectural Practice. Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference (Hong Kong, CN, 2017), 387–397.
 Costa,A.andNannicini,G.2018.RBFOpt:anopen-sourcelibraryforblack-boxoptimizationwithcostly function evaluations. Mathematical Programming Computation. (2018).
 Danhaive, R.A. and Mueller, C.T. 2015. Combining parametric modeling and interactive optimization forhighperformanceandcreativestructuraldesign. Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2017 (Amsterdam, NL, 2015).
 Evins,R.2013.Areviewofcomputationaloptimisationmethodsappliedtosustainablebuildingdesign. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 22, (Jun. 2013), 230–245.
 Flöry, S., Schmiedhofer, H. and Reis, M. 2012. Goat. Rechenraum.
 Radford, A.D. and Gero, J.S. 1980. On Optimization in Computer Aided Architectural Design. Building and Environment. 15, (1980), 73–80.
 Rutten,D.2013.Galapagos:OntheLogicandLimitationsofGenericSolvers. Architectural Design.83, 2 (2013), 132–135.
 Rutten, D. 2010. Grasshopper®. Robert McNeel and Associates.
 Scheer, D.R. 2014. The Death of Drawing: Architecture in the Age of Simulation. Routledge.
 Tian, Z., Zhang, X., Jin, X., Zhou, X., Si, B. and Shi, X. 2018. Towards adoption of building energy simulation and optimization for passive building design: A survey and a review. Energy and Buildings. 158, (Jan. 2018), 1306–1316.
 Vierlinger, R. 2012. Octopus. Bollinger+Grohmann Engineers.
 Waibel, C., Wortmann, T., Evins, R. and Carmeliet, J. 2019. Building energy optimization: An extensive benchmark of global search algorithms. Energy and Buildings. 187, (2019), 218–240.
 Wetter, M. 2001. GenOpt–A Generic Optimization Program. Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference (Rio de Janeiro, BR, 2001), 601–608.
 Wortmann, T. 2018. Genetic Evolution vs. Function Approximation: Benchmarking Algorithms for Architectural Design Optimization. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.09.001.
 Wortmann, T. 2017. Opossum—Introducing and Evaluating a Model-based Optimization Tool for Grasshopper. Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference (Hong Kong, CN, 2017), 283–292.
 Wortmann,T.andSchroepfer,T.2019.FromOptimizationtoPerformance-InformedDesign.Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (Atlanta, GA, 2019).
 2005. DesignBuilder. DesignBuilder Software Ltd.  1998. modeFRONTIER®. ESTECO.