Ship accident prevention under organizational influences on the ship operation by using gap analysis
Abstract
By using Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), the identification of human factor could be analyzed and classified to find out some prevention actions against ship accident. The human factors may play an important role in ship accident as the consequences of the ship operation is the risk that can potentially happen. One of the layers of HFACS is the organization influences which consist of factors such as human resources, organization climate, and policies. The objective of this research was to identify and to explore the perception and the expectation of the ship officer related to organizational influences by applying gap analysis method. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions divided into three categories. The result showed that the policies factor has higher gap compared with the others factors. The result indicated that the shipping company need to pay more attention to the condition of organizational policies before recruiting new crews, as well as the policies related to the monitoring while they are on board and after they return home. Further research on similar method on others layers of HFACS need to be carried out in order to obtain more detailed descriptions on ship accident prevention strategies.
References
[1] Arif, T. (2016, 11 28). Gatra News. Kemenhub Akan Bentuk Pengadilan Maritim di Bawah Mahkamah Pelayaran. Retrieved from www.gatra.com: https://www.gatra.com/hukum/231105-kemenhub-akanbentuk- pengadilan-maritim-di-bawah-mahkamah-pelayaran
[2] Adebukola Yewande Daramola, ”An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors.
[3] Danang Sunyoto. (2009) Analisis Regresi dn Uji Hipotesis. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Media Pressindo.
[4] Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341-357.
[5] Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus PT. XYZ). Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi, 96.
[6] KNKT (National Transportation Safety Committe). (2016). Marine Accident Investigation. Jakarta: KNKT.
[7] Metin Celik and Selcuk Cebi, (2009) ”Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 41, pp. 66-75.
[8] Muchsam, Y., Falalah, & Irianto, G. (2011). Penerapan Gap Analisis Pada Pengembangan Sistim Pendukung.
[9] Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[10] Service, Lloyd Marine Infomation. (2011, April 13). Ship Accident Category. Retrieved from www.iacs.org. uk/document/public/Publications/
[11] Tony Wijaya, (2011) Manajemen Kualitas Jasa. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT. Indeks.
[12] Trans, H. B. (2016, 03 1). Berita Trans. KNKT: Kecelakaan Kapal Penyeberangan Di Indonesia 80% Karena Human Error. Retrieved from http://beritatrans.com/2016/03/31/knkt-kecelakaan-kapalpenyeberangan- di-indonesia-80-karena-human-error/: http://beritatrans.com
[13] Transportasi, Komite Nasional Kecelakaan. (2016). Data Investigasi Kecelakaan Pelayaran Tahun 2010 - 2016. Jakarta: Media Release KNKT.
[14] Uma Sekaran. (2006) Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Jakarta, Indonesia: Salemba Empat.
[15] Wiegman, D. A., & Shapell, S. A. (2000), ”Human Error Perpectives in Aviation,” The International.
[16] Antoro, D., & Priadi, A. A. (2016). Applying The Human Factor Analysis And Classification System (HFACS) For The Identification of Foundered Ship Accident Report. Unternational Conference on Maritime Education and Training (p. 35). Semarang: Semarang Merchant Marine Polytechnic.
[17] Antoro, D., & Priadi, A. A. (2017). Gap Analisis For Preventing Ship Accident Under Pre Condition For Unsafe Act On Ship Operation. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Terapan (p. 171). Jogyakarta: Semarang Merchant Marine Polytechnic, Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Gajah Mada 2017.