The Intention to Enroll among Students of Private Higher Learning Institutions

Authors

  • Nazlan Mohamed Nazidin Faculty of Management, Universiti College of Yayasan Pahang, Jalan Tanjung Lumpur, 26060 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia; Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Ishak Ismail Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Hasnah Haron Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5069

Abstract

Higher education hub in Malaysia has become intense in the form of competition. Private Higher Learning Institutions (HLIs) has to work harder to win the competition between the education services in the marketplace. Thus, with the total numbers of Private HLI and programmes available for choice, it is a complex situation to investigate the way students select Private HLI. Due to that, it is a key issue for Private HLI owners to understand what are the determinant factors that influence the students’ intention to enroll in Private HLI. This conceptual paper discusses the influence of promotional efforts, the role of family and attitude on the intention to enroll in private HLIs. Theory of Reason Action is used as the underpinning theory for this conceptual paper. The outcome of this study from the findings will be able to assist Ministry of Education and Private HLIs on how to increase the enrolment of Private HLIs and thus to assist them on how to meet the objective of the Malaysian Education Blueprint 2015-2025.

References

Adrean A.R. (2010). Factors influencing international students’ choice of Aarhus School of Business, Department of Marketing and Statistics, MAPP.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.

Armitage, C.J., & Corner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic reiew. British journal of Social psychology, 40, 471-499.

Auto, E., Keely, R.H., Klofsten, M., Parker, G.G.C., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent ang stdents in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145-160.

Binsardi, A. & F. Ekwulugo (2003). International marketing of British education: research on the student’s perception and the UK market penetration. Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 21(5): 318- 327.

Chapman, D. 1981. “A model of student college choice”, Journal of Higher Education, 52(5): 490-505.

Fishbein, Martin and Izek Ajzen (1975), Beliefs, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.

Furukawa, D.T., (2011). College Choice Influences Among High-Achieving Students: An Exploratory Case Study of College, Freshmen. UNLV Theses / Dissertations / Professional Papers / Capstones.Paper 1091.

Geoffrey, W & Paul L. (2015). Private Higher Education in Malaysia: Are We Heading Towards A Crisis, Penang Institute.

Gonca, T.Y., (2006). University Evaluation Selection: A Turkish Case, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 20 Issue: 7, pp.559-569

Gutman, J. & Miaoulis, G. (2003). Communicating a Quality Position in Service Delivery: An application in higher education. Managing Service Quality, vol. 13 no 2, pp. 105-11

Hay, D., & Fourie, M. (2002). Preparing the way for mergers in South African higher and further education institutions: An investigation into staff perceptions. Higher Education,44, 115–131

Ismail, N. (2009). “Mediating effect of information satisfaction on college choice”, Paper presented in Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program. UK.

Ivy, J. (2001). “Higher education institution image: a correspondence analysis approach”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 15 Nos 6/7, pp. 276-82.

Jackson, G.A. (1982). Public efficiency and private choice in higher education. Educational and Policy Analysis, 4(2), 237-247

Joseph Sia K.M. (2011). Institutional Factors Influencing Students’ College Choice Decision in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 1 No. 3; December 2010.

Joseph Sia K.M. (2011). A model of higher education institutions choice in Malaysia – A conceptual approach. International Conference on Business and Economics Research, vol.1 IACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Kotler, P. & Fox, K. (1995). “Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions”, 2

Kolter, P. (1976). Applying marketing theory to college admissions. In A role for marketing in college admissions. (pp. 54-72) New York: The College EntranceExamination Board.

Lapovsky, L. (2014). The higher education business model: Innovation and financial sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.tiaa.crefinstitute.org

Lawrence, A., Ismail, M., Ahmad, A. & Othman, J. (2009). Background of Malaysian Private institutions of higher learning and challenges faced by academics. The journal of international social research, volume 2/8 summer 2009.

Loh, T.H. (2011). Sustainable competitive advantage for market leadership amongst the private higher institutes in Malaysia. Journal of Global Management, vol. 2, issue 2, pages 216-226.

Malaysian Education Blueprint 2015 – 2025 (Higher Education) and Website Jabatan Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Manstead, A. S. R., Plevin, C., & Smart, J. L. Predicting mothers’ choice of infant feeding method. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manchester, 1981.

Md. Sidin, S., Hussin, SR & Tan, H.S. (2003). An exploratory study of factors influencing the college choice decision of undergraduate students in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management review, 8(3), 259-280.

Molly, N.L. (2004). Restructuring Higher Education in Malaysia. School of Educational Studies, UniversitiSains Malaysia.

Perna, L. W. (2000). Differences in College Enrollment Among African Americans, Hispanics and Whites. Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 7 No 3, pp. 267-83.

Radzol, A. R. M., Cheng, K. T. G., Hashim, H., & Ismail, N. A. (2017). Antecedents influencing parents’ decisions in selecting higher education institutions. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(3 Special Issue), 715–732.

Ross, M., Heaney, J., & Cooper, L. (2007). Institutional and managerial factors affecting international student recruitment management. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(7), 593-605.

Sami A.K., & Sree Rama M.Y. (2017). Financial sustainability of private higher education institution: The case of publicly traded educational institutions. Investment Management Financial Innovations (open-access), 14(3), 25-38.

Sarver, V. T. (1983). Ajzen and Fishbein’s ”theory of reasoned action”: A critical assessment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13(2), 155-163.

Savanov, S. P., Kharlamova, E. E., Chekhovskaya, I. A. & Polyanskaya, E. A. (2015). Evaluating financial sustainability of higher education institutions. Asian Social Science, 11(20), 34.

Soutar, G. & Turner, J. (2002). Students’ Preference for University: A Conjoint Analysis, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 40-45.

Tan, Y.S. & Raman, S.R. (2009). The transformation from elitist to mass higher education in Malaysia: problems and challenges. Centre for policy research and international studies.

Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Melanthiou, Y. (2007). A contemporary higher education studentchoice model for developed countries. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 979–989.doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.023

Zain, O.M., Tahir, J.M., & Ibrahim, A. (2013). Factors influencing students’ decisions in choosing private institutions of higher education in Malaysia: A structural equation modelling approach. Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 75-90.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-18

How to Cite

Mohamed Nazidin, N. ., Ismail, I., & Haron, H. (2019). The Intention to Enroll among Students of Private Higher Learning Institutions. KnE Social Sciences, 3(22), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5069