Download fulltext HTML
Sunarti, E., Faizah Fithriyah, A., & Ulfa, M. (2019). Family-Friendly Kampong (FFK) Modelling: Developing Urban Resilience in Disaster-Prone Area. KnE Social Sciences, 3(21), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.4972

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.4972

statistics

  • 326 Abstract Views
  • 226 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Euis Sunarti

    Euis Sunarti

    Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Aliya Faizah Fithriyah

    Aliya Faizah Fithriyah

    Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Milatul Ulfa

    Milatul Ulfa

    Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Aug 5, 2019

Family-Friendly Kampong (FFK) Modelling: Developing Urban Resilience in Disaster-Prone Area

KnE Social Sciences / Equity, Equality, and Justice in Urban Housing Development (ISTEcS 2018) / Pages 243–255

Abstract

Family-friendly integrated and holistic development is the principal solution for many socio-cultural, economic, and ecological problems of marginal families lived in a disaster-prone area. This descriptive-qualitative study at Panaragan Village Bogor city, a hydrometeorology hazard area, has elaborated characteristics and vulnerability of family and community, areal typology, family and environment transaction, also social environment vulnerability and quality. Data were collected from interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and observation then analyzed with a gap, potential, and SWOT analysis. Results showed that Panaragan had shown features as FFK, characterized by high territorial-bound, well-maintained social capital and leadership (formal and informal) strengthened with organizational facilities, well perception about the family condition, also superior awareness of potential threat and vulnerability in family and community. With diverse topography, FFK model based in hamlet (RW) level. FFK development was done with positive-labeling, intrinsic spirit of community cohesiveness, a satisfaction of acceptance and recognition, social piety, volunteerism, and generosity. Derivative strategy of FFK model aimed to find competitive and comparative excellence of community productive activities, provide chances for elderly to be senior citizen, escalate community leaders and youth capacity, upgrade public figures and religious leaders’ leadership, maintain inter-family communication and interaction, preserve community leaders’ motivation, and disseminate social environment maintenance burden.


 


 


Keywords: ecology family, family-friendly kampong, family transaction, urban resilience

References
[1] Sunarti, E. (2015). Ketahanan Keluarga Indonesia: Dari Kebijakan dan Penelitian Menuju Tindakan: Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar IPB. Bogor (ID). IPB.


[2] Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (2009). Human ecology theory. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 419-450). Springer, Boston, MA.


[3] Melson, L. G. (1980). Family and environment: An ecosystem perspective. Burgess Pub. Co..


[4] Berns, R. M. (1997). Ecology of the Peer Group. Child, family, school, Community socialization and support. Ed 4th. Harcurt Brace. Florida, 332-346.


[5] Klein, D. M., & White, J. M. (1996). Family theories: An introduction (pp. 149-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.


[6] Sunarti, E. (2006). Indikator keluarga sejahtera: Sejarah pengembangan, evaluasi, dan keberlanjutannya. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.


[7] Sunarti, E. (2009). Pengembangan Model Ecovillage: Pembangunan Kawasan Perdesaan Serta Sumbangan Pertanian Bagi Peningkatan Kualitas Hidup penduduk Perdesaan. Naskah Akademis LPPM - FEMA IPB.


[8] Sunarti E, Tati, Atat, Raffela RN, Lembayung D.P. (2005). Pengaruh Tekanan Ekonomi Keluarga, Dukungan Sosial, Kualitas Perkawinan, Pengasuhan dan Kecerdasan Emosi Anak Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Anak. Jurn. Media Gizi dan Keluarga. 29 (1), 34-40.


[9] Sunarti, E. (2018). Work Stability, Economic Pressure and Family Welfare in Indonesia, The Social Sciences, 13: 1186-1193.


[10] Sunarti, E. (2001). Studi ketahanan keluarga dan ukurannya: telaah kasus pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas kehamilan (Disertasi). Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia.


[11] Zeitlin, M. F., Megawangi, R., Kramer, E. M., Colletta, N. D., Babatunde, E. D., & Garman, D. (1995). Strengthening the family: Implications for international development. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.


[12] Evans, G. W., Lercher, P., & Kofler, W. W. (2002). Crowding and children’s mental health: the role of house type. Journal of environmental psychology, 22(3), 221-231.


[13] Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., & Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 27(2), 313-326.


[14] Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural hazards, 32(1), 89-110.


[15] Alcayna-Stevens, T. (2015). Slum socio-ecology: an exploratory characterisation of vulnerability to climate-change related disasters in the urban context.


[16] Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. Journal of aging research, 2012.


[17] Ullman, E. L. (1956). The role of transportation and the bases for interaction. In Man’s role in changing the face of the earth, 862-880


[18] Sunarti, E. (2013a). Potret Ketahanan Keluarga Indonesia di Wilayah Tertinggal, Terpencil, Perbatasan, Kumuh, dan Rawan Bencana. IPB Press. Bogor.


[19] Sunarti, E. (2013b) Potret Ketahanan Keluarga Indonesia. Perpektif Keragaman Pola Nafkah Keluarga. Widyalika Utama. Jakarta