Animal Farm Is a World of Man

Abstract

In the beginning of the 20th century, feminist literary theory was concerned mainly with the social and political role of women, as well as women’s role in literature. In the second half of the century, it is tried to study women’s social positions and their rights compared to the male counterpart. One of the most explored themes since then was gender and patriarchy. The aim of this paper is to show how women were depicted in literature after half a century of the struggle of the first wave feminist towards equality and stress the importance of theorizing the concept of patriarchy, as a first step to understanding women’s subjugation. This unfolds through a re-visitation of George Orwell’s fiction novels. Orwell is better known by his political writing. Although


he has never used the word “Feminism”, in any of his fictional works, two decades after his death, the radical feminist, Daphne Patai accused him that he is anti-feminist, fundamentally because of his deprecatory stands towards women through his female characters. The selected texts reinforce patriarchal ideology, through the way Orwell portrayed his male and female characters. A feminist analytical approach will be adopted in the realization of this research, in order to analyse the novel in depth, with a focus on Orwell’s portrayal of female characters. Observing and commenting how he debases, mistreats and degrades them. Further, it sheds the light on how he portrays his male characters by analysing female and male protagonists. The significant of the study is to show the social and political context of the time regarding the role and the identity of women in the British society in the 20th century, and how women were treated under patriarch society and still until our days. Moreover, it sheds light on how patriarchy the concept of women oppression helped in the development of feminist theories.


 


 


Keywords: Patriarchy, oppression, female, feminism, male.

References
[1] Aweda, A. D. (1984). Sex-role inequalities in the African family: Contemporary implications. Ife Social Sciences Review, 7(1), 188–197.


[2] Bernard, J. (1981). The good-provider role: Its rise and fall. American Psychologist, 36(1), 1.


[3] Bhasin, kamla. (2006). what is patriarchy:women unlimited. In New delhi.


[4] Brown, K. (2016). A Feminist Analysis of Human and Animal Oppression: Intersectionality Among Species.


[5] Bryson, V. (2003). Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction, (October), 292.


[6] Carrigan, T., Connell, B., & Lee, J. (1987). The sex role framework and the sociology of masculinity. Weiner, G. and Arnot, M.(1987) Gender Under Scrutiny. New Inquires in Education.


[7] DOREY-STEIN Caroline. (2015). A Brief History: The Three Waves of Feminism.


[8] Eckstein, A. (1984). Orwell,Masculinity and feminist critisism.


[9] Mounce, W. D. (1994). The Morphology of Biblical Greek: A Companion to the Basics of Biblical Greek and Analytical Lexicon to the Greek New Testament, 362. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books ei=gDwbUvvzHyX0AWumYDIDA&id=vbxfAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1


[10] Mures Rachel. (2005). feminism, gender, and theology. (the modern theologians, Ed.). oxford:blackwell.


[11] Patai, D. (1984). The Orwell mystique: a study in male ideology. Univ of Massachusetts Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= g-gyr7ddFYUC&pgis=1


[12] POLLERT, A. (1996). GENDER AND CLASS REVISITED: OR, THE POVERTY OF ‘PATRIARCHY.’ The British Sociological Association, 30(Sociology), 639–659.


[13] Sultana, A. (2012). Patriarchy and Women’s Subordination: A Theoretical Analysis. Arts Faculty Journal, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3329/afj.v4i0.12929


[14] Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarch. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073659


[15] Wood, J. M. (2013). Patriarchy, Feminism and Mary Daly: a Systematic-Theological Enquiry Into Daly ’ S Engagement With Gender Issues in Christian Theology.