Gender Differences in Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Political Speech
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4849Abstract
The objective of this study were to describe the ways of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton deliver speech in political field, to derive the characteristics of male and female’s poitical speech and to elaborate the reason of male and female politicians deliver their political speech. This researh conducted by applying descriptive qualitative research. The data of this study were 92 utterances of male politician and 51 utterances of female politician. Which were selected from male and female politicians’ presidential announcement speech in United States from year 2015. The findings showed that male and female politicians used both report and rapport talk in delivering their speech. Male mostly used report talk than rapport talk in show his self confidence and his status, and used rapport talk to gain relationship with other to gain support while female combine the both talk types in almost same amounts tend to imitate male speech behavior in order to defend her status and gain relationship with others. Male politician frequently show the characteristics of male communication, such as: status, independence, advice,information, and order in his way of delivering speech. While, female politician showed her support, intimacy, understanding, feeling, proposal in her speech. The reason why male politician used report talk whereas female politician used rapport talk is because male treats the language to give factual information, tease or thread other and show or keep his status and power, whereas female did it as a way to negotiate closeness and intimacy.
Keywords: Gender differences, Report Talk & Rapport Talk, Political Speech
References
Arustamyan, R. (2014). The Manifestation of Gender Peculiar in Political Discourse. Armenian Folis Anglistika:Yerevan State University
Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. London/New York: Routledge.
Bogdan, R, and Biglen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (2003). Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cameron, D. (1996).“The language-gender interface: challenging co-optation“ in Bergvall, Bing & Freed (Eds.), Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice, Addison Wesley Longman, New York, pp. 31–53.
Carrol, S.J., Dodson, D.L., Mandel, R.B. (2002). The Impact of Women in Public Office: An Overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women in Politics
Case, S.S. (2000). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: an analysis of managerial women’s language. In Rose, S., Larwood, L. (ed.) Women IS Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls. New York: Praeger, 41-63
Coates, J. (2003). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. London: Longman
Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Dovi, S. (2008). Theorizing Women’s Representation in the United States. In Wolbrecht, C., Beckwith, K., Baldez, L. (eds.) Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148-166
Edelsky, C., Adams, K.L. (1990). Creating equality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9 (3), 171-90
Hilma, A. (2014). Social and Linguistics Analysis of Women’s Political Discourse. The International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 2(11)
Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Longman
Hudson. (1980). Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119–147
Kathlene, L. (2004). Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor? In DuerstLahti, G., Kelly, R (eds.) Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 167-193
Khalida, N, et all. (2012). Language and Gender in Political Discourse (Mass Media Interview). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 (2013) 417-422 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.201301.079
Labov, W. (1972). The Social Stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper Colophon Books
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2004). Gender Roles and Power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall
M.B. Miles and A.M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expended Sourcebook 2
Mohindra, V and Azhar, S. (2012). Gender Communication: A Comparative Analysis of Communicational Approaches of Men and Women at workplaces. IQSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol. 2 Issue 1.
Nicholson, L. (1994). Interpreting gender. Signs, 20 (1), 79-105
Norris, P. (1996). Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?, In Lovenduski, J., Norris, P. (eds.) Women in Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-104
Sivric, M. (2014). Gender Differences in Political Discourse. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.14706?JFLTAL152227
Solheim, B.O. (2000). On Top of the World: Women’s Political Leadership in Scandinavia. Wesport CT: Greenwood Press
Tamale, S. (2000). “Point of Order Mr. Speaker”: African women claiming their space in parliament. Gender and Development, 8 (3), 8-25
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Coversation. New York: William Morrow
Trudgill, P. (2000) Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society (4th edn.). London: Penguin
Wardough. (2002). Language, Gender and Discourse. New York: Routledge
Wodak, R. (2008). Multiple Identities: The Roles of Female Parliamentarians in the EU Parliament. In Holmes, J., Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell Publishing, 671-69
