The Aspiration of Departement in College by Gender Tendency

Authors

  • Kusumawati Kusumawati Yogyakarta State University
  • Suwarjo Suwarjo Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4679

Abstract

Interest in this research arises from one of the things that sometimes escape the attention, namely the gender tendency toward a major in college. This study used final teenage data at first year students at Yogyakarta State University to see how gender differences can represent aspirations for science and social-humaniora majors. Data were collected using a scale. Scale was distributed to 425 respondents by sampling propotioned cluster random sampling. Using the survey method we found that men dominate in the exact plane of about 62.5% and women about 37.4%. The opposite is shown in the non-exact plane dominated by women with a percentage of about 80.4% and about 19.5% of males. This difference is also supported by other factors such as

the importance of achievement beliefs in the department, and gender stereotypes in the community that are still inherent. This research is expected to contribute to the literature on career development and can form the basis of the formulation of career guidance programs that can include attention to gender differences.

 

 

Keywords: department in college; gender; late adolescence; identity career status.

Author Biography

Suwarjo Suwarjo, Yogyakarta State University

Interest in this research arises from one of the things that sometimes escape the

attention, namely the gender tendency toward a major in college. This study used final

teenage data at first year students at Yogyakarta State University to see how gender

differences can represent aspirations for science and social-humaniora majors. Data

were collected using a scale. Scale was distributed to 425 respondents by sampling

propotioned cluster random sampling. Using the survey method we found that men

dominate in the exact plane of about 62.5% and women about 37.4%. The opposite is

shown in the non-exact plane dominated by women with a percentage of about 80.4%

and about 19.5% of males. This difference is also supported by other factors such as

the importance of achievement beliefs in the department, and gender stereotypes in

the community that are still inherent. This research is expected to contribute to the

literature on career development and can form the basis of the formulation of career

guidance programs that can include attention to gender differences.

References

Blakemore, S.-J., & Mills, KL (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-psych-010213-115202

Dik, BJ, Sargent, AM, & Steger, MF (2008). Career Development Strivings. Journal of Career Development, 35(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845308317934

Duffy, RD, & Sedlacek, WE (2010). The salence of career calling among college students: exploring group differences and links to religiouisness, life meaning, and life satisfaction. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10. 1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Geldard, K. (2009). Youth counseling: practical interventions for risky teens. (K. Geldard, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, PM, & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), n / a. https: //doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363

Howard, AL, & Galambos, NL (2011). Transitions to adulthood. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 1.

Kim, AY, Sinatra, GM, & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM Identity Among Young Women: A Social Identity Perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957

Kroger, J. (2007). Identity development (Second). California: Sage Publication.

Morgan, SL, Gelbgiser, D., & Weeden, KA (2013). Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection. Social Science Research, 42(4), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSRESEARCH.2013.03.008

Patel, SG, Salahuddin, NM, & O’Brien, KM (2008). Career decision-making selfefficacy of Vietnamese adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 34(3), 218-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845307308488

Perez, T., Cromley, JG, & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of educational psychology, 106 (1), 315.

Priess, HA, Lindberg, SM, & Hyde, JS (2009). Adolescent gender-role identity and mental health: Gender intensification revised. Child Development, 80(5), 1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01349.x

Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-wada, A. (2010). Who Wants to Have a Career in Science or Math? Exploring Adolescents’ Future Aspirations by Gender and Race / Ethnicity, 95(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20431

Robnett, RD, & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship Groups, Personal Motivation, and Gender in Relations to High School Students’ Career Interest STEM. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12013

Santrock, JW (2014). Adolecence (fifteenth). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Thorne, A., & Michaelieu, Q. (1996). Situating Adolescent Gender and Self-Esteem with Personal Memories. Child Development, 67(4), 1374–1390. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01802.x

Tracey, TJG, Robbins, SB, & Hofsess, CD (2005). Stability and change in interests: A longitudinal study of adolescents from grades 8 through 12. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.002

Wang, M.-T., Eccles, JS, & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937

Yusuf, AM, & Daharnis, D. (2013). Journal of counseling and education. Journal of Counseling and Education (Vol. 1). Retrieved from http://journal.konselingindonesia. com/index.php/jkp/article/view/108/91

Zafar, B. (2013). College Major Choice and the Gender Gap. Journal of Human Resources, 48(3), 545–595. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.3.545

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Kusumawati, K., & Suwarjo, S. (2019). The Aspiration of Departement in College by Gender Tendency. KnE Social Sciences, 3(17), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4679