Download fulltext HTML
Tanjung, Y., Astuti, B., & Arisandi, A. (2019). Influence of Group Guidance with Discussion Techniques on Local Learning Interest. KnE Social Sciences, 3(17), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4662

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4662

statistics

  • 243 Abstract Views
  • 245 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Yoppry Tanjung

    Yoppry Tanjung

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Budi Astuti

    Budi Astuti

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Andika Arisandi

    Andika Arisandi

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Published Date

  • Jun 30, 2019

Influence of Group Guidance with Discussion Techniques on Local Learning Interest

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Meaningful Education (ICMEd) / Pages 377–388

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of group guidance with discussion techniques on the interest in learning local content. This research method uses Experiments with 8 subjects of research, which is obtained from the results of questionnaire analysis that has been tested for validity as a support for an approach to teachers guidance and counseling. Data were analyzed quantitatively descriptively. The results of this Experimental study indicate that group guidance with discussion techniques can influence the interest in learning local content on 8 students who are subject. Score of interest in learning local content before being given an action (pre-test) that is 43 in the low category. After being given an action (post-test) the score was 55 which was categorized as moderate. Thus it can be recommended that group guidance with discussion techniques can influence the interest in learning local content for students in the school.


 


 


Keywords: Local Learning Interests, Group Guidance Services, Discussion Techniques

References
[1] Ahmadi, Abu. 2009. Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[2] Arifin, Zainal. 2011. Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[3] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[4] Budinigsih, Asri. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.


[5] Dalyono, M. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.


[6] Fernando, Refki. 2011. Kurikulum Muatan Lokal. http://refkifernando.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal 8 Agustus 2014.


[7] Khairani, Makmun. 2013. Psikologi Belajar. Aswaja Pressindo:Yogyakarta.


[8] Loekmono. 2012. Ciri-Ciri Minat Belajar. http://dicari-saja.blogspot.com.Diakses pada tanggal 8 Agustus 2014.


[9] Loman Bolam, dkk., (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. Palembang: Unsri.


[10] No Name. 2013. Unsur-Unsur Minat. http://bagawanabiyasa.wordpress.com.


[11] Diakses pada tanggal 9 Juni 2014.


[12] Prayitno dan Erman Amti. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: PT. Rineka.


[13] Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[14] Soewardi. 2008. PengertianMuatan Lokal. http://makalahdanskripsi.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal 9 Juni 2014.


[15] Sudarmono. 1994. Minat Belajar. http://dicari-saja.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal 5 juni 2014.


[16] Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: ALFABETA.


[17] Sukardi, Dewa ketut. 2008. Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[18] Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2004. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV. Raja Grafindo Persada.


[19] Susanto, Ahmad. 2013. Terori Belajar Pembelajaran. Kencana: Jakarta.


[20] Syah, Muhibbin.2012. Psikologi Belajar. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada: Jakarta.


[21] Wisudita, Cokro. 2014. Lampiran II dan III Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan Nomor 81a tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. http:// cokrowisudita.blogspot.com.


[22] Diakses pada tanggal 8 Agustus 2014.