Download fulltext HTML
Tiara Puri, I., & ., R. (2019). The Impact of Road Construction Program: Evidence from East Java, Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 3(13), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i13.4269

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i13.4269

statistics

  • 215 Abstract Views
  • 200 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • I Tiara Puri
    No author data available.
  • Rumayya .
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Mar 31, 2019

The Impact of Road Construction Program: Evidence from East Java, Indonesia

KnE Social Sciences / The 2nd International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business, and Philanthropy (2nd ICIEBP) / Pages 1085–1092

Abstract

The purpose of the Jalan Lintas Selatan ( JLS) construction program is to reduce the inequality between the southern and the northern area in East Java. In order to measure the success of the road construction program, this study aims to evaluate the socioeconomic impact on villages passed by the JLS. Especially in Pacitan, Trenggalek and Tulungagung districts. This study uses Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Difference in Difference (DID) to evaluate the causal impact, while the data are obtained from survey Potensi Desa (PODES) in 2008, 2011 and 2014. The findings of this study show that the road construction program has a positive impact to the regions. Due to the construction, population density, investment and job opportunities increased. It also shortens the distance of schools to the village center, especially senior high school. Interestingly it is also decreased length to karaoke. However, we also find that the road construction reduce the Own-Source Revenue (Pendapatan Asli Daerah) of the village government.


 


 


Keywords: road construction program, Jalan Lintas Selatan, Propensity Score Matching, Difference in Difference, village socioeconomic.

References
[1] . (2015). Laporan Akhir Tahun 2015 Pembangunan Jalan & Jembatan Lintas Selatan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Bina Marga Provinsi Jawa Timur


[2] Adler, A. Tanpa Tahun. Evaluasi Ekonomi Proyek-Proyek Pengangkutan. Terjemahan oleh Paul Sitohang. 1983. Jakarta: UI Press


[3] Anwar, A. & Tito, M. (1996). Sistem Transportasi di Kawasan Metropolitan. Jakarta dan Implikasinya Kepada Kesejahteraan Golongan Masyarakat Kecil. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Pedesaan (PWD), 2: 93-123


[4] Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in A Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth. Journal of political economy, 98(5, Part 2): S103-S125


[5] Hulten, C. R., & Schwab, R. M. (1991). Public Capital Formation and The Growth of Regional Manufacturing Industries. National Tax Journal,: 121-134


[6] Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. World Bank Publications


[7] Lokshin, M., & Yemtsov, R. (2005). Has Rural Infrastructure Rehabilitation in Georgia Helped the Poor?. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2): 311-333


[8] Mu, R., & Van de Walle, D. (2009). Rural Roads and Local Market Development in Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(5):709-734.


[9] Nasution, M. 1994. Manajemen Transportasi. Bogor: Gahlia Indonesia


[10] Siregar, M. 1990. Beberapa Masalah Ekonomi dan Management Pengangkutan. Jakarta: FE UI


[11] Warda, H. C. (2013). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Ekonomi Antara Wilayah Utara dan Selatan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 1(3)


[12] Lampiran 1 Statistik Deskriptif Variabel Outcome Desa Sebelum dan Sesudah Proyek