Download fulltext HTML
., M., Laras Nugraheni, P., & Martiastuti, K. (2019). Analysis of Family Typology Based on Family Development Stage. KnE Social Sciences, 3(12), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i12.4092

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i12.4092

statistics

  • 5491 Abstract Views
  • 1005 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Mulyati .
    No author data available.
  • P Laras Nugraheni
    No author data available.
  • K Martiastuti
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Mar 25, 2019

Analysis of Family Typology Based on Family Development Stage

KnE Social Sciences / 3rd UNJ International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training 2018 (3rd ICTVET 2018) / Pages 266–280

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze family typology based on the stages of family development in people living in cultural heritage areas. This study used a survey method involving 100 families that were selected through simple random sampling of four hamlets in Segaran Village, Batujaya District, Karawang Regency, West Java. Family typology includes four dimensions, namely regenerative, resilient, rhythmic, and traditionalistic, each stage consists of two indicators and produces eight family typologies. Instruments in family typology are developed with reference to McCubbin and Thomson (1987). Data were analyzed by descriptive using nest structure test and relationship test. The test results showed that most of the Segaran villagers were at development stage of the launching family, teenage family and school age family. The dominant family type of the three family stages is the family type of regenerative family (in dimension 1), resilient family (in dimension 2), rhythmic family (in dimension 3), and traditionalistic family (in dimension 4).


 


 


Keywords: family development, typology, heritage area, cultural

References
[1] Duvall, EM. (1971). Family Development: Fourth Edition. Toronto: JB Lippincott Company.


[2] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya. Jakarta: UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database.


[3] McCubbin HI. Thompson. [1987]. Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison.


[4] Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The McMaster approach to families: Theory, assessment, treatment and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 168-189. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.00145


[5] Smith, K. M., Freeman P. A., & Zabriskie, R. B. (2009). An examination of family communication within the core and balance model of family leisure functioning. Family Relations Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 58, 79-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1741- 3729.2008.00536.x


[6] Clark, R. D., & Shields, G. (1997). Family communication and delinquency. Adolescence, 32(125), 81-92.


[7] Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48(1), 59-75. doi: 10.1080/10510979709368491