Sustainability Indicators Sanitation Eco Village of Waste Bank: Case Study in Jakarta
Abstract
This research explains about sustainability indicator for the sanitation of eco-village of waste Bank. Sustainability indicators consist of the voice of society, regulation, the condition of finance, supply chain pressure, and internal pressure. In this case, the Cililitan village Waste Bank built by society commitment and run as a Cooperative business. Data collection was done through interview, questionnaires, data triangulation, and literature study. The method used in this study is a mixed method. Researchers see that the waste Bank cooperatives have not been appropriately managed because managerial resources do not maximize existing potential, and sustainability of the development of waste Bank cooperatives tends to stagnate, even though opportunities in the framework maximize the economic potential of organizations to improve the welfare of open citizens very wide. Waste cooperatives also become additional income and also education environment for its citizens but not optimal in its implementation, involvement residents have not yet reached the stage of implementing good sustained.
Keywords: sustainability, cooperative business, waste bank
References
[1] Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., and Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, no. 29, pp. 1–51.
[2] Belhouari, A., Buendía Martínez, I., Lapointem, J., et al. (2005). Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas: ¿Un Nuevo Valor para las Cooperativas? CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no. 53, pp. 191–208.
[3] Bollas-Araya, H. M., Seguí-Mas, E., and Polo-Garrido, F. (2014). Sustainability reporting in European cooperative banks: an exploratory analysis. REVESCO, Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, no. 115, pp. 30–56.
[4] International Co-Operative Alliance (ICA) (1995). Statement on the Cooperative Identity. Manchester: ICA 1995 General Assembly.
[5] International Co-Operative Alliance (ICA) (2013). Blueprint for a Co-operative Decade. ICA.
[6] Carrasco, I. (2007). Corporate social responsibility, values, and cooperation. International Advances in Economic Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 454–460.
[7] Mozas, A. and Puentes, R. (2010). La responsabilidad social corporativa y su paralelismo conlas sociedades cooperativas. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, no. 103, pp. 75–100.
[8] Server, R. and Capó, J. (2011). The interrelationship between the demands of Corporate Social Responsibility and co-operative principles and values. CIRIECEspaña, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no. 73, pp. 213–272.
[9] ACCA. (2004). Towards Transparency: Progress on Global Sustainability Reporting 2004. London. Retrieved from: ACCA/CorporateRegister.com
[10] Adams, C. A. and Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 14, pp. 97–115.
[11] Dando, N., and Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195–200.
[12] Dando, N. and Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195–200.
[13] Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., et al. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–98.
[14] Simnett, R. (2012). Assurance of sustainability reports. Revision of ISAE 3000 and associated research opportunities. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 89–98.
[15] Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., and Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 937– 967.