Multiplier Effect of the Role of Government Policy with Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Order to Improve Performance and Competitiveness of UMKM in the Province of Bali

Abstract

The Indonesian economy currently relies on Micro-, Small-, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The important role of MSMEs is shown by their large numbers and moving in various business sectors and touching the interests of the community, being the business sector with the greatest contribution to national development, and creating considerable employment opportunities for domestic workers. The seriousness of the government’s role in improving the performance and competitiveness of MSMEs is needed, including making innovative efforts to take advantage of various opportunities including the assistance of the private sector. The implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be seen as an alternative form of government intervention in terms of policy, so that the synergy of the private sector in implementing CSR with the MSMEs is expected to stimulate improvement in the performance and competitiveness of MSMEs. This study aims to prove the multiplier effect of the role of government policy with the implementation of CSR in order to improve the performance and competitiveness of MSMEs. The research sample was determined by the proportionate cluster random sampling of 67 MSMEs spread across Bali. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively using Partial Least Square Path Modeling. The results of the study prove that the role of government policy with the implementation of CSR concurrently influences the 5 performance variables and 6 variables of competitiveness of MSMEs. This proves that the role of government policy with the implementation of CSR has been proven to provide a multiplier effect on improving the performance and competitiveness of MSMEs.


 


 


Keywords: multiplier effect, role of government, implementation of CSR, performance, competitiveness, MSMEs

References
[1] Afthanorhan, W. M. (2013). A comparison of partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 198–205.


[2] Barney, J. B. and Wright, P. M. (1998). On Becoming a Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resource in Gaining Competitive Advantage. Human Resources Management.


[3] Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach to structural equation modeling, in G. A. Marcoulides (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


[4] Ringle, C. M., Gotz, O., Wetzels, M., et al. (2013). On the use of Formative Measurement Specifications in Structural Equation Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Compare Covariance-Based and Partial Least Squares Model Estimation Methodologies. Hamburg Univ.


[5] Amir, E. and Imran, A. (2013). The effect of training on employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, vol. 5, no. 4.


[6] Fornell, C. and Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 19, pp. 440–452.


[7] Grant, R. M. (2001). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.


[8] Wiggins, R. R. (1997). Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and The Rarity of Persistent Superior Economic Performance. A.B. Freeman School of Business Tulane University.


[9] Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29, pp. 745–768.


[10] Chin, W. W. (1998). A Partial Least Squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Journal of Marketing Research.