Impact of Field Experience on Pedagogical Competence of Economic Education Students


This study uses a quantitative approach with correlational methods. The technique used in data collection is questionnaire (questionnaire). Data analysis was done using simple regression test. The results of this study indicate the influence of the practice of field experience on the pedagogical potential of prospective students of the Economic Education Study Program of the Faculty of Economics, Gorontalo State University. The result of a simple linear regression equation is the Field Experience Practice of Pedagogical Competence, namely Ŷ = 12.627 + 0.81 X; the equation implies that if there is a change of one unit in the Field Experience Practice variable it will be followed by an average change of 0, 81 on the Pedagogical Compatibility variable. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the degree of relationship between X Variables (Field Experience Practices) and Y Variables (Pedagogic Compatibility) is 82.24%. This means that 82.24% of the variations that occur in variable Y can be explained by Variable X.



Keywords: practice field experience, pedagogic competency

[1] Arikunto, S. (2016). Fundamentals of Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: PT. Earth Literacy.

[2] Bhakti, M. (2016). LPTK strategy in developing pedagogic compatibility of teacher candidates. Journal of Education, vol. 1, no. 2.

[3] Hartiningtyas, L., et al. (2016). Improving pedagogic and professional comprehension of vocational teachers through empowerment of sustainable professional development (PKB). State University of Malang, National Education Seminar.

[4] Choirul, H. and Udik, Y. (2012). Student Performance Analysis of PPL Participants FKIP Kanjuruhan University Malang. Kanjuruhan University Educational Inspiration Journal Malang.

[5] Masaong, et al. (2017). PPL Guidance System for Guidance and Assessment of Field Experience Programs. Gorontalo: LP3M

[6] Priansa, J. D. (2014). Teacher’s Performance and Professionalism. Alfabeta: Bandung Sardiman; (2011). Interaction and Motivation in Teaching and Learning. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

[7] Standards of Educators and Education Personnel. (2005). Law number 19 of 2005, concerning National Education Standards.

[8] Sudjana, N. (2016). Assessment of the Results of the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: PT. Teen Rosdakarya offsets.

[9] Sugiyono. (2015). Educational Research Methods. Quantitative and Qualitative Approach, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta Publisher.