GI Assisted Go: An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students Creative Thinking Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3893Abstract
The purpose of this research is to improve students’ creative thinking ability through Group Investigation (GI) learning model assisted by Graphic Organizer (GO) in science education subject by using classroom action research. The subjects of the study were class II/E PGSD, FIP, UNY students. Data collection techniques used observation and test. Data analysis techniques used quantitative descriptive and n-gain. Indicators of creative thinking ability include fluency, originality, flexibility, and elaboration. The results of this study indicate the implementation of GI assisted GO, in Cycle I, the implementation reached 81.25% with good category, increased up to 97.90% in cycle II with very good criteria. The result of creative thinking ability test in Cycle I reached 69.95 with creative category, up on Cycle II to 80.35 with creative category. In addition, the improvement of students’ creative thinking ability before and after action is also increasing, the normalized gain test result between Pre-cycle and Cycle I is 0.20 with low category, whereas between Pre-cycle and Cycle II it increases to 0.48 with category medium. The conclusion of this research indicates that the implementation of GI assisted GO can improve students’ creative thinking ability in the process of learning activity of science education course. The purpose of this research is to improve students’ creative thinking ability through Group Investigation (GI) learning model assisted by Graphic Organizer (GO) in science education subject by using the classroom action research. The subjects of the study were class II/E PGSD, FIP, UNY students. Data were collected from observation and test. Data analysis techniques used quantitative descriptive and n-gain. Indicators of creative thinking ability include fluency, originality, flexibility, and elaboration. The results of this study indicate the implementation of GI assisted GO, in cycle I implementation reached 81.25% with good category, increased up to 97.90% in cycle II with very good criteria. The result of creative thinking ability test in cycle I reached 69.95 with creative category, up on cycle II to 80.35 with creative category. In addition, the improvement of students’ creative thinking ability before and after action is also increasing, the normalized gain test result between pre-cycle and cycle I is 0.20 with low category, whereas between pre-cycle and cycle II it increases to 0.48 with category medium. The research concludes that the implementation of GI assisted GO can improve students’ creative thinking ability in the process of learning activity of science education course.
Keywords: creative thinking ability, group investigation (GI) learning model assisted graphic organizer (GO)
References
Anderson, Lorin W., Krathwohl, David R., ..., Wittrock, Merlin C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom ’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (ABRIDGED ed.). United State: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R.I. (2004). Learning toTeach. Sixth Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill
Arends, R.I. & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching For Student Learning: Become An Accomplished Teacher. New York: Routledge
Coughlan, A. (2007). Learning to learn: Creative thinking and critical thinking. DCU Student Learning Resources.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Harianti, A., & Margaretha, Y. (2015). Pengembangan Kreativitas Mahasiswa dengan Menggunakan Metode Brainstorming dalam Mata Kuliah Kewirausahaan. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 13(2).
Johnson, E.B. (2009). Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan kegiatan belajarmengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. (Ibnu Setiawan, Trans). Bandung: MLC.
Joyce, B., Marsha Weil,. Emily Calhoun. (2009). Models of Teaching: Model-model
Pengajaran. (8
Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials Of Creativity Assesment. Hoboken: Jhon Willey & Sons, Inc.
Kemmis, Stephen., McTaggart, Robin., & Nixon, Rhonda.(2014). The Action Research Planner. Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Retrieved from https://link. springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Mcknight, Katherine S. (2010). The Teacher’s Big Book of Graphic Organizers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mujakir, M. (2017). KREATIVITAS GURU DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA DI SEKOLAH DASAR. Lantanida Journal, 3(1), 82–92.
Munandar, Utami. 2009. Pengembangan Kreatifitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Mustadi, A. (2013). Competency-Task Based Curriculum Design dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di PGSD. DIDAKTIKA, 4(1).
Prabowo, U. N. (2012). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Pemalang. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Setiyawati, E., & Rocmah, L. I. (2017). Peningkatan Karakter Mahasiswa Program Studi PGSD pada Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD di Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 32–42.
Setyaningsih, N. (2009). 12PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN KREATIF MAHASISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PENGANTAR DASAR MATEMATIKA MELALUI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS KONSTRUKTIVIS
Slavin, Robert.E.2015. Cooperative Learning Teori Riset dan Praktik. (Narulita Yusron, Trans). Bandung: Nusamedia
Wannapiroon, P. (2014). Development of research-based blended learning model to enhance graduate students’ research competency and critical thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 486–490.
Wiranata, R., & Aisyah, S. (n.d.). TARGET DAN STRATEGI STKIP PGRI LUMAJANG DALAM MENINGKATKAN PERAN MATAKULIAH KEWIRAUSAHAAN TERHADAP PROGRAM KREATIVITAS MAHASISWA.
