Globalization, Social Media and Public Relations: A Necessary Relationship for the Future?


Globalization is gradually ensuring the homogenity of all goods and services, together with social and cultural influences around the world. New technologies have affected the way that stakeholders exercise public relations. Rapid globalization has created new opportunities and challenges as well as public relations practices. In particular, the popularity of social media renders it top of the agenda for many business executives today. Savvy organizations now use social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram in order to inform their public about events and new products and also gather and disseminate consumer opinions about the organization, its events and products.  The aim of this paper is to investigate how social media has reshaped the exercise of public relations in the newly globalised era. Have international companies and organizations extended their existing framework to accommodate these new tools?



Keywords: Globalization, Social Media, Public Relations, PR 2.0, Intergovernmental Organizations

[1] Curtis, L. et al, 2010. Public Relations Review, 36(1), pp. 90-92.

[2] Parveen, F. et al, 2015. Social media usage and organizational performance: Reflections of Malaysian social media managers. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), pp. 67-78.

[3] Breakenridge, D., 2008. PR 2.0: New Media, New Tools, New Audiences. FT Press.

[4] Clark, C. E., 2000. Differences Between Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis. Public Relations Review, 26(3), pp. 363-380.

[5] Cutlip, S. M., 2013. Public relations history: From the 17th to the 20th century: The antecedents. Routledge, New York, London.

[6] Grunig, J. E. and Hunt, T., 1984. Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

[7] Kotler, P., 2003. Marketing Management. Prentice Hall, USA.

[8] Cutlip, S. M. et al, 1994. Effective public relations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[9] Grunig, J. E. and Grunig, L. A., 1996. Implications of symmetry for a theory of ethics and social responsibility in public relations. In annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.

[10] Wilcox, D.L. et al, 2003. Public Relations: Strategies and Tactics. Allyn & Bacon, New York.

[11] Mylona, I. and Amanatidis, D., 2017. Public Relations in the era of Web 2.0 and Semantic Web. e-QQML, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries: an International Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(1).

[12] Brown, R., 2009. Public Relations and the Social Web: How to use social media and web 2.0 in communications. Kogan Page Publishers.

[13] Solis, B. and Breakenridge, D., 2009. Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR. FT Press.

[14] Kelleher, T., 2009. Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59, pp. 172-188.

[15] Macnamara, J., 2010. Public communication practices in the Web 2.0-3.0 mediascape: The case for PRevolution. PRism, 7(3), pp. 1-13.

[16] Waters, M., 1995. Globalization. Routledge, London and New York.

[17] Giddens, A., 1993. Sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge, Oxford.

[18] Curran, J. P. and Gurevitch, M. (Eds.), 1992. Mass Media and Society. Edward Arnold, London.

[19] McGrew, A., 1992. The state in advanced capitalist societies. Political and Economic Forms of Modernity, pp.65-126.

[20] Allen, J., Braham, P. and Lewis, P. G. (Eds.), 1992. Political and economic forms of modernity. Cambridge: Polity press.

[21] Marx, K., 1977. On Dialectical Materialism. FireBird Publications Inc., USA.

[22] Robertson, R., 1995. Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. Global modernities, 2, pp.25-45.

[23] Featherstone, M., Lash, S. and Robertson, R. (Eds.), 1995. Global modernities, vol. 36, Sage, London.

[24] Haas, E. B., 1990. When knowledge is power. Berkeley University Press.

[25] Karns, M. P. and Mingst, K. A., 2004. International organizations. The Politics and Processes of Global Governance, 2, 22.

[26] Hulme, D. and Edwards, M. (Eds.), 1997. NGOs, states and donors: too close for comfort? Macmillan, London.

[27] Ossewaarde, R. et al, 2008. Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: how organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28(1), 42-53.

[28] Obar, J. A. and Wildman, S., 2015. Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), pp. 745-750.

[29] Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M., 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), pp. 59-68.

[30] Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B., 2008. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated communication, 13(1), pp. 210-230.

[31] Aichner, T. and Jacob, F., 2015. Measuring the degree of corporate social media use. International Journal of Market Research, 57(2), pp. 257-275.