Download fulltext HTML
Salsabila, A., & Hasnawati, S. (2018). Value At Risk and Expected Returns of Portfolio (Companies Listed on LQ45 Index Period 2013–2016). KnE Social Sciences, 3(10). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3407

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3407

statistics

  • 525 Abstract Views
  • 330 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • A Salsabila
    No author data available.
  • S Hasnawati
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Nov 12, 2018

Value At Risk and Expected Returns of Portfolio (Companies Listed on LQ45 Index Period 2013–2016)

KnE Social Sciences / The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation (ICOI-2018) /

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate whether there is a positive relationship between Value at Risk and Expected Portfolio Returns on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population of this research is companies listed on the LQ45 index for the period 2013–2016, and the sample is 20 companies that meet the criteria. Markowitz method was used to form 65 portfolios; each consists of a combination of two stocks that have a negative correlation. The result shows that there is no positive relationship between Value at Risk and Expected Portfolio Returns. On the contrary, the correlation coefficient indicated that there is a negative relationship between the variables, which means that there is an inverse relationship (high return low risk, and vice versa). It proves that the assumption of a rational investor is avoiding risk (risk averse). This result is also supported by the findings from Schroders Global Investment Trends Survey 2015, which shows that 63% of investors in Indonesia prefer to allocate their investments in instruments with low- and medium-risk levels. However, it does not mean that the concept of high-risk high-return is not applicable in Indonesia because the result is not significant.


 


 


Keywords: Value at Risk, Markowitz Method, Expected Return Portfolio

References
[1] Bali, T. G. and Cakici, N. (2004). Value at risk and expected stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 57–73.


[2] Best, P. (1998). Implementing Value at Risk. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.


[3] Chen, D.-H., Chen, C.-D., and Chen, C.-C. (2010). VaR and the cross-section of expected stock returns: An emerging market evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 15, no. 3.


[4] Gallati, R. (2003). Risk Management and Capital Adequacy. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.


[5] Harper, D. (2017). An Introduction to Value at Risk (VAR). Retrieved from https:// www.investopedia.com/articles/04/092904.asp


[6] Iqbal, J. and Azher, S. (2014). Value-at-risk and expected stock returns: Evidence from Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 71–100.


[7] Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (fourth edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill Co.


[8] Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–91.


[9] Stambaugh, F. (1996). Risk and Value at Risk. European Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 612–621.