The Influence of Learning Motivation, Learning Ways, and Variation of Teaching Styles Towards Learning Activeness in the Subject of Public Administration at Grade X Students of Automatic Expertise Program and Office...

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to know whether or not learning motivation, learning ways, and variation of teaching styles influence students learning activeness simultaneosly and partially.The population of this study was 80 Grade X Students of Automatic Expertise Program and Office Governance of Vocational High School NU 01 Kendal. Sampling technique used saturated sampling that is all members of the population become the sample of the study. The data were obtained through questionnaire, observation, interview, and documentation. The data were analyzed by using classis assumption test analysis, multiple regression analysis, hypothesis test analysis, percentage descriptive analysis using SPSS for Windows Release 23.The findings of this study shows that multiple regression analysis obtained equation: Y = 3.304+ 0,406x1 0.221x2+ 0.170x3 + e. Simultaneosly, Learning motivation, learning ways, variation of teaching style influence students learning activeness positively and significantly in the amount of 56.1percent. While partially, learning motivation influences students learning activeness in the amout of 16,81percent, learning ways 7.29percent, and variation of teaching style 7.56percent. It can be concluded that learning motivation, learning ways, variation of teaching styles influence students learning activeness simultaneosly and partially.


 


 


Keywords: Learning Motivation, Learning Ways,Variation of Teaching Styles, and Students Learning Activeness.

References
[1] Amalia, K. (2016). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri, Motivasi Belajar, Gaya Mengajar Guru, dan Lingkungan Keluarga Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas Xi Ips Sma Negeri 1 Pemalang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 5(1), 1–12.


[2] Dalyono, M. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[3] Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[4] Djamarah, S., & Aswan, Z. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[5] Febrianto, A. (2014). Pengaruh Keterampilan Mengelola Kelas dan Gaya Mengajar Guru Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Kelas Xi Materi Pembelajaran Pembangunan Ekonomi Sma Negeri 2 Slawi. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 2(3), 1–8.


[6] Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.


[7] Hamalik, O. (2003). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Bumi AksaraHasibuan, J.J., & Moedjiono. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[8] Hasibuan, J.J., & Moedjiono. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[9] Kardoyo, -., & Hayuningtyas, E. (2009). Model Pembelajaran Role Playing Pada Mata Pelajaran Ps-Ekonomi Materi Pokok Manusia Sebagai Makhluk Sosial Dan Ekonomi. Dinamika Pendidikan, 4(2), 141-160.


[10] Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[11] Nuryati. (2016). Pengaruh Cara Belajar, Disiplin, Dan Motivasi Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 5(2), 630–642.


[12] Partono. (2009). Persepsi Siswa Atas Pengaruh Keterampilan Mengajar Guru dan Pengelolaan Kelas Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Dinamika Pendidikan, 4(1).


[13] Peterria, V. (2016). Pengaruh Lingkungan Sekolah, Cara Belajar, Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Mengelola Peralatan. Economic Education Analysis Journal,5(3), 860–873.


[14] Ratnawati,A. (2014). Pengaruh Kesiapan Belajar, Minat Belajar, Motivasi Belajar, dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Jurusan Administrasi Perkantoran Pada Mata Diklat Produktif Ap Di Smk Negeri 2 Semarang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 77–82.


[15] Rifa’i, A., & Catharina, T. A. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: Unnes Press.


[16] Sadirman. (2007). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.


[17] Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


[18] Sudjana, H. N. (2010). Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.


[19] Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.


[20] Susilowati. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar, Keterampilan Mengelola Kelas, dan Variasi Gaya Mengajar Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Jurusan Administrasi Perkantoran Pada Mata Pelajaran Mengoperasikan Aplikasi Perangkat Lunak Di Smk Muhammadiyah Bobotsari Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 1–14.


[21] Tusyanah, Maftukhah, I., Arief, S., & Sakitri, W. (2016). The Contribution of Classical Music Given Outdoor to Improve Indonesian High School Students Ability in Descritive Text Writing. The Asian EFL Journal, (95), 34–62.


[22] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.


[23] Usman, M. U. (2009). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[24] Widiati, E. D. N. (2016). Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Fasilitas Belajar, dan Gaya Mengajar Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Kelas X Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Di Sma N 2 Kendal. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 1–10.


[25] Yulianto, A. (2007). Peningkatan Kualitas Proses Dan Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Teori Akuntansi Melalui Pendekatan Discovey Learning. Dinamika Pendidikan, 2(1), 71-84