School Accountability Model Based on Performance

Abstract

This study aims to identify and develop models of accountability in schools. Management Based on School (MBS) provides a broad autonomy for schools to manage schools independently to achieve school goals effectively and efficiently. So far, school accountability is not supported by clear performance standards. The development of school accountability model based on performance is expected to support school accountability based on more measurable performance standards. This research was conducted at Private Senior High School at Semarang. This research uses a ”Research and Development” approach that is research followed by development through field study process, model design development, test and validation. The results showed that schools do not have complete standard operating procedures of education service, the contribution of School components in evaluation of school performance are still low, there is no clear follow-up to the evaluation result. It is suggested that schools create complete standard operating procedures for educational service, increase the involvement of school components in school performance evaluation, evaluation results serve as a reference for planning in the next year.


 


 


Keywords: accountability, school, performance

References
[1] Jalal, Fasli. 2001. Paradigma Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.


[2] Mulyasa. 2009. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.


[3] Pratiwi, Elga. 2012. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran dan Sistem pelaporan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Sekolah. Laporan Penelitian.


[4] Oktarina, Nina. 2016. Akuntabilitas Sekolah untuk Menjamin Mutu Pendidikan (Studi Kasus di SDN Lamper Tengah.


[5] Rasul, Syahrudin, 2003. Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Anggaran dalam Perspektif UU NO. 17/2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: PNRI


[6] UNDP. 2000. Membuat Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta.


[7] Rohiat. 2012. Manajemen Sekolah. Teori Dasar dan Praktik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.


[8] Turner, Mark, dan David Hulme. 1997. Governance, Administration, and Development. London: MacMillan Press.


[9] LAN dan BPKP. 2000. Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance. Lembaga Administrasi Negara. Jakarta.


[10] Fattah, Nanang. 2012. Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan dalam Konteks Penerapan MBS. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.


[11] Hoy, Wayne K, & Miskel, Cecil G. 2014. Administrasi Pendidikan Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.


[12] Slamet, PH. 2005. Handout Kapita Selekta Desentralisasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama, Depdiknas RI.


[13] Zahroh, Aminatul. 2014. Total Quality Management: Teori & Praktek Manajemen untuk mendongkrak Mutu Pendidikan, cetakan I. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz z Media.


[14] Mahmudi. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.


[15] Wiklund, Johan. 1999. The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, p. 37-55.


[16] Brondon, Charles H., dan Ralph E. Dartina. 1997. Management Accounting: Strategy and Control. Canada: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.


[17] Bastian, Indra. 2001. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE Universitas Gajah Mada.


[18] Dwiyanto. 2002. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PSKK-UGM.


[19] Nurkholis. 2003. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah, Teori, Model, dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.


[20] Muhammad, Ali. 2008. Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.