Impact Measurement of Programs Provided By Charity Civil Society Organizations for Community Development in Bahrain

Abstract

The objective of this research is to elaborate an analytical analysis of the contribution of charity civil society organizations working in the Kingdom of Bahrain for community development purposes. A thorough literature survey of the field of public policy analysis and program evaluation reveals that many evaluation models exist for this purpose. The framework of programs evaluation proposed by the authors Marceau et al. (1992) and Marceau (2012) is a useful tool to reach the general objective of this research project. The methodology of this research is a case study of the Social Charity Organization of Sadad. A questionnaire was elaborated for this purpose that investigates the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the program. The results of this research project provide a good understanding of the effectiveness and efficiency of charity civil society organizations working in the Kingdom of Bahrain regarding the principle of community development and citizen-life improvement proposed by the National Economic Vision of Bahrain 2030.


 


 


Keywords: Impact Measurement of Program, Charity Civil Society Organizations, Community Development, Regression Analysis, Correlation, Kingdom of Bahrain

References
[1] Beaudry, J., & Gauthier, B. (1992). L’évaluation de programme. In Gauthier B.(dir.), De la problématique à la collecte de données (pp. 425–452). Montreal: Quebec University Press.


[2] Bradshaw T, Winn K (2000). “Gleaners, Do-gooders, and Balers: Options for Linking Sustainability and Economic Development”. Community Development Society. 31(1): 112-129.


[3] Bussmann, W., & Knoepfel, P. (1998). Les contextes idéaux-typiques de l’utilisation des évaluations. In Politiques publiques: évaluation. Paris: Economica.


[4] Crête, J., Imbeau, L. M., & Lachapelle, G. (1994). Politiques provinciales comparées. Saite-Foy: La Presse.


[5] E-Government Portal – Bahrain 2030: The Economic Vision 2030. Retrieved on 01/09/2018. https://www.bahrain.bh/wps/portal/!ut/p/a1/jdDBDsFAEAbgB5J0x i5tHVeDVtoQVGsv0spapbpSjXp8ixNSzG2SbzL_DHCIgRfJJZNJlakiye89N9fuBM02sck YF-EQ2WTecf2BS3FmabB6AZQONDCtqbXsEdPG_-aRBE7b62gQBIjM7s_8xdBBHNE _5xuK_dw_FwVEwN_Y5xUP8C3mEzTnGAOXuUr1T6M-cOqnpFXf07MipbYEXoqtK EVp7NS5griua0MqJXNhbBI4HcMwvnr77iFiN3LQkyk!/dl5/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQS Eh/


[6] El Dessouky, N. F. (2016, April). Public Policy Evaluation Theory: From First to Fifth Generation. EPRA International Journal of Economics and Business Review, 4(4), 15–25.


[7] Gboyega Jibowo (1992). Essentials of Rural Sociology. Abeokuta, Nigeria: Gbemi Sodipo Press Ltd, p. 231.


[8] Holmquist F (1984). “Self-help: The State and Present Leverage in Kenya, Africa”. Canadian Journal of Studies. 54(3): 72-91.


[9] Knoepfel, P., Kissling-Näf, I., & Bussmann, W. (1998). L’évaluation et l’analyse des politiques publiques. In Politiquespubliques: évaluation (pp. 129–140). Paris: Economica.


[10] Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., & Varone, F. (2001). Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques. Lausanne, Switzerland: Université de Lausanne.


[11] Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, F., & Savard, J.-F. (2015). Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques. Presses de l’Université du Québec. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1f1hcw3


[12] Marceau, R. (2012). Program Evaluation. In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration. Retrieved from www.dictionnaire.enap.ca


[13] Marceau, R., Otis, D., & Simard, P. P. (1992). La planification d’une évaluation de programme. In R. Parenteau (Ed.), Management Public. Presses de l’Université du Québec.


[14] Ministry of Social Development- NGOs Directory. Retrieved on 01/09/2018. http:// www.mlsd.gov.bh/en/ngos/ngos_directory


[15] Ministry of Social Development – Our Social Services: Empowering the Individual.. Advancing the Society. Retrieved on 01/09/2018. http://www.social.gov.bh/sites/ default/files/img/files/OurServices.pdf


[16] Sneddon CS (2000). “Sustainability in Ecological Economics, Ecology and Livelihoods: A Review”. Progress in Human Geography. 24(4): 521-549