Understanding the Core Ideas of Hermeneutics Figures
Abstract
This article will talk about core ideas of hermeneutics figures bearing many concepts in the interpretation discipline. Those core ideas are crucial because the scope, postulation, and hypotheses are very comprehensive due to philosophical language making it hard work to understand them. The research methodology applied in this article is qualitative library research. Based on the analysis, it was found that Friederich Schleiermacher was the founding father of hermeneutics. His well-known theory is about intuitive interpretation or intuition-based interpretation. The other problem with this article is about highlighting the other figures’ contribution. Dilthey, Heidegger, Gadamer, Betti, and Hirsch have opposing ideas, albeit somehow identical in some senses, in regard to hermeneutics. Nevertheless, they had an enormously significant impact in hermeneutics. On the other hand, Ricoeur and Habermas impacted hermeneutics differently by introducing new concepts. Ricoeur popularized hermeneutic phenomenology while Habermas claimed the importance of dialogue in understanding a meaning that had three crucial aspects in this world: an objective, social, and subjective world.
Keywords: core ideas, hermeneutics figures, intuition-based interpretation
References
[1] Kharmandar MA, Karimnia A: The fundamentals of constructing a hermeneutical model for poetry translation. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2013; 70: 580-591.
[2] Palmer RE: Hermenuetika: Teori baru mengenai interpretasi [New theories of interpretation]. Jogiakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2003.
[3] Gusmao DS, Martinho G: Hans-georg gadamer: penggagas filsafat hermeneutik modern yang mengagungkan tradisi [Zans-georg gadamer: the originator of a modern hermeneutic philosophy that exalts tradition]. Yogyakarta: Kanisius; 2013.
[4] Grondin J: Sejarah hermeneutik: dari plato sampai gadamer [History of hermeneutics: from plato to gadamer]. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media; 2016.
[5] Silverman D: Qualitative methodology and sociology: describing the social world. United Kingdon: Gower Pub Co; 1985.
[6] Ormiston GL, Schrift AD: The hermeneutic tradition: from ast to ricoeur. New York: SUNY Press; 1990.
[7] Schleiermacher F: Schleiermacher: hermeneutics and criticism: and other writings. England: Cambridge University Press; 1998 Nov 26.
[8] Dilthey W: Wilhelm dilthey: selected works, volume iv: hermeneutics and the study of history. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2010.
[9] Laverty SM: Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qualit Methods. 2003; 2: 21-35.
[10] Oilman PJ: Hermeneutics in research practice. The principles of knowledge creation. Massachusetts: Edwar Elgar Publishing, Inc.; 2007.
[11] Shapiro G, Sica A: Hermeneutics: Questions and prospects. Massachusetts: Univ of Massachusetts Press; 1988.
[12] Kaiser Jr WC, Silva M: Introduction to Biblical hermeneutics: the search for meaning. Michigan: Zondervan; 2009.
[13] Ricoeur P: From text to action: essays in hermeneutics, II. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2008.
[14] Torgerson D: Interpretive policy inquiry: a response to its limitations. Policy Sci. 1986; 19: 397-405.