Behavioristic Theory and Its Application in the Learning of Speech
Abstract
The objective of this research was to test the application of Thorndike and Skinner's behavioristic learning theory, particularly in storytelling learning. The points studied were the law of readiness, the law of exercise, and the law of effect in storytelling learning in SMP 19 Surakarta. The approach employed was a descriptive qualitative approach. The subjects of the research were a class of 7B graders, consisting of 32 students. Data was collected via questionnaires, interviews, and observation during the learning process. The object of research was speech learning, particularly storytelling. Data was analysed using an interactive model encompassing (1) data collection, (2) data reduction, (3) data display, and (4) conclusion drawing. This study concludes that the application of the law of readiness, law of exercise, and law of effect developed by Thorndike and Skinner effectively improved the speaking skills of students in SMP 19 Surakarta.
Keywords: behavioristic, consequential law, practice law, readiness, speaking
References
[1] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional (Permendiknas) Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru [Regulation of the Minister of National Education (Permendiknas) Number 16 Year 2007 regarding Academic Qualification Standards and Teacher Competencies].
[2] Aunurrahman: Belajar dan pembelajaran [Learning and learning]. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2012.
[3] Sunardi S: Sumber belajar penunjang PLPG: materi pedagogik. Kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan direktorat jenderal guru dan tenaga kependidikan [Learning Resources of PLPG Support: Pedagogic Material. Ministry of Education and Culture Directorate General of Teachers and Education Personnel]; 2016
[4] Herrnstein RJ: On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13: 243-266.
[5] Sanjaya W: Kurikulum dan pembelajaran: teori dan praktik pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) [Curriculum and learning: theory and practice of curriculum development level of education unit (KTSP)]. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group; 2011.
[6] Klinger E: Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychol Rev. 1975; 82: 1-25.
[7] Iskandarwassid, Sunendar D: Strategi pembelajaran bahasa [Language learning strategy]. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2008.
[8] Griffiths C, Parr JM: Language-learning strategies: teory and perception. ELT J. 2001; 55: 247-254.
[9] Zimmerman BJ: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Pract. 2002; 41: 64-70.
[10] Majid A: Strategi pembelajaran [Learning strategy]. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2013.
[11] Muammar: Bahasa dan sastra dalam berbagai perspektif [Language and literature in different perspectives]. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Tiara Wacana; 2008.
[12] Ferris D, Tagg T: Academic listening/speaking tasks for ESL students: problems, suggestions, and implications. Tesol Q. 1996; 30: 297-320.
[13] Dewantara IPM: Penerapan pendekatan pragmatik (prinsip-prinsip penggunaan bahasa) disertai teknik koreksi sesama teman dan koreksi oleh guru untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menceritakan pengalaman pada siswa kelas viie smp negeri 5 negara [Implementation of pragmatic approach (principles of language use) accompanied by friends and correction correction technique by master to improve skill of telling of experience to students of class viie smp negeri 5 negara]. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan. 2013; 3: 110-121.
[14] Dick C: The systemic design of instruction. New York: Longman; 1978.