Integrating Intralingual and Extralingual Cotext in Educational Pragmatic Learning

Abstract

Humans do not learn from experience but rather from the reflection of experiences that have been felt. Therefore, educational pragmatic learning, which has not developed in Indonesian language learning, needs to be reflected in order to become a new experience that can benefit both oneself and others in the future. One of the important things with respect to one’s experience is communicating by understanding the cotext. However, the cotext itself between one expert and another has a different understanding of several cotexts, such as (1) the linguistic cotext, (2) the social cotext, (3) the cotext of the situation, and (4) the cultural cotext. Language learning involving cotexts is categorized as educational pragmatic learning. It is designed by integrating both intralingual and extralingual cotexts so that language learning in addition to being linguistic can also be cotextual.


 


Keywords: cotext, educational pragmatics, intralingual/extralingual

References
[1] Searle, J. R. (1962). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


[2] Brown, G. and Yule, G. (2005). Pragmatik [Pragmatic]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; Jakarta: PT Gramedia.


[3] Levinson, S. (1965). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


[4] Hyme, D. (1974). On Communicative Competence Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.


[5] Leech, G. (1989). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik [Pragmatic principles]. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.


[6] Pranowo. (2009). Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.


[7] Halliday, Micahel, A. K., and Hassan, R. (1985). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.


[8] Pranowo. (2015). Unsur Intralingual dan ekstralingual sebagai penanda dalam daya bahasa dan nilai rasa bahasa dalam kesantunan berkomunikasi [Intralingual and extraningual elements as a marker in language power and language sense in communicative practice]. Jurnal Adabiyat Bahasa dan Sastra, vol. 7, pp. 191–225.


[9] Cook, G. (1999). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


[10] Song, L. (2010). The role of cotext in discourse analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 6, pp. 876–879.


[11] Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


[12] Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press.


[13] Pranowo. (2015). Faktor dan strategi pengembangan budaya baca melalui membaca pemahaman mahasiswa [Factors and strategies for reading culture development through reading student understanding]. Linguistik Indonesia, vol. 33, pp. 153–171.