Moral Discourse as Resource of Publicity: Religious and Secular Alternatives
Abstract
In recent years, the defense of traditional values became one of the soundest strategies of religious authorities, as well as political powers in Russia. The author observes main arguments in the debates on traditional values presented by the hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church and political leaders, and figures out basic principles of the discourse: the “continuity” of the core values of Russian culture through its history; the opposition of Russia and “The West” as a significant reference point, which seems to be a recurrent thing in Russian identity building; the indissoluble link between [traditional] religion and morality. The author concludes that significant shortcoming of the ideology of traditional values is that they exist only on a discursive level, not manifesting themselves in everyday moral practices, although should contribute to the formation of national identity. Hence, the ‘traditional values’ discourse is aimed at the cohering the nation around certain meanings that are assumed as obtaining both historical and ideological integrity.
Keywords: tradition, values, Russian Orthodox Church, morality, national identity.
References
[1] Agadjanian, A. 2011. “Exploring Russian Religiosity as a Source of Morality Today.” In Multiple Moralities and Religions in Post-Soviet Russia, edited by Jarett Zigon, 16-26. New York – Oxford: Berghahn Books.
[2] Agadjanian, A. 2017. “Tradition, Morality and Community: Elaborating Orthodox Identity in Putin’s Russia.” Religion, State and Society, 45 (1): 39-60.
[3] Curanovic´, A. 2014. “Weaknesses of the Post-Soviet Religious Model: The Kremlin and ‘Traditional’ Religions in Face of Interethnic Tensions in Russia”. Politics and Religion, 7 (4): 788–817.
[4] Laruelle, M. 2014. “Beyond Anti-Westernism: The Kremlin’s Narrative about Russia’s European Identity and Mission”. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 326. Retrieved from: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-df/ Pepm326_Laruelle_August2014.pdf
[5] His Holiness Kirill, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. 2011. Freedom and Responsibility: A Search for Harmony – Human Rights and Personal Dignity. London Darton, Longman & Todd; Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow Patriarchate.
[6] Kirill. 2014. – “Vystuplenie Sviateishego Patriarkha Kirilla na Rozhdestvenskikh parlamentskikh vstrechakh v Sovete Federatsii RF” [His Holiness Patriarch of Moscow statement for the Christmas parliamentary meeting in the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation]. The Russian Orthodox Church: official site of the Moscow Patriarchate. Retrieved from: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3544704. html
[7] Kruglova, T., and Litovskaya, M. “Sovetskij mir: konformizm i konformisty” [Soviet world: conformism and conformists]. Vestnik Permskogo universitets, ser. Istoria, 30 (3): 67-73.
[8] Putin, V. 2012. “Address to the Federal Assembly”. Retrieved from: http://eng. kremlin.ru/transcripts/4739
[9] Putin, V. 2013. “Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly”. Retrieved from: http: //eng.kremlin.ru/news/6402
[10] Ryabykh, F. 2013. “New Challenges to Religious Freedom in Europe.” In Freedom of Religion or Belief in Foreign Policy: Which One? Edited by Pasquale Annicchino. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.
[11] Stepanova, E. 2015. “‘The Spiritual and Moral Foundation of Civilization in Every Nation for Thousands of Years’: The Traditional Values Discourse in Russia.” Politics, Religion & Ideology, 16 (2-3): 119-136.
[12] Stoeckl, K. 2012. “The Human Rights Debate in the External Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church”. Religion, State & Society, 40 (2): 212–232.
[13] Stoeckl, K. 2016. “The Russian Orthodox Church as Moral Norm Entrepreneur”. Religion, State and Society, 44 (2): 132-151.