New Languages of the Avant-garde and Symbolic “Opening” of the Soviet Urban Areas
Abstract
The article analyzes the potential of the avant-garde architecture to give a boost to the development of the Soviet urban areas under current conditions. The author states that the growing interest to the objects of the avant-garde heritage contributed to the appearance of the new vision of the Soviet urban districts filling them with new meanings and symbolic values. For that reason, the proposed paper aims to outline and describe the main narratives of the Soviet avant-garde architecture that have taken shape in recent decades and have gradually established in a public discourse. By means of this exploration the author seeks to trace symbolic transformation of the Soviet urban districts and, thus, to argue that their change under post-Soviet conditions depend not so much on the new urban city-planning initiatives as on the new symbols and meanings that could give a new perception of these spaces in the current social and cultural contexts.
Keywords: Soviet avant-garde architecture, urban areas, discourses, practices of representation, languages of description, utopia, creative industries, cultural initiatives
References
[1] Albokrinova, A. 2017. “Vokrug Fabriki-kuhni. Anons lekcii ob istorii Samarskoj fabriki-kuhni v Srednevolzhskom filiale GCSI” [“Around the Factory-kitchen”. Announcement of the lecture about history of the Factory-kitchen in Samara to be held in the Middle Volga Branch of NCCA]. Retrieved from: http://www.ncca.ru/ events.text?filial=9&id=4396
[2] “Bauhaus na Urale. Ot Solikamska do Orska.” 2008. [Bauhaus in the Urals. From Solikamsk to Orsk]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Ekaterinburg: “Webster.”
[3] Belova E. and A. Savitskaya. 2011. Kommunal’nyj avangard: kat.-putevoditel’ [Communal avant-garde: catalogue-guide book]. Nizhnij Novgorod: NCCA VolgaVyatka region branch.
[4] Bondarenko, I.A. ed. 2015. Han-Magomedovskie chtenija: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, 18-20 janvarja 2012 g. Filial FGBU «CNIIP Minstroja Rossii» NIITIAG [Han-Magomedov’s readings: materials of the scientific conference, 18- 20 January 2012, Filial FGBU «CNIIP Minstroja Rossii» NIITIAG]. Moscow, SaintPetersburg: Kolo.
[5] Chepkunova, I. 2014. Kuznica bol’shoj arhitektury. Sovetskie konkursy 1920-1950-h. [Powerhouse of Big Architecture. Soviet architectural competitions of 1920-1950s]. Moscow: Iskusstvo XXI vek.
[6] Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. New York, London: Routledge.
[7] Golovneva, E. V. 2016. “Mifologizacija ede sposob konstruirovanija gorodskoj identichnosti (Ekaterinburg na internet-forumah)” [Mythologization as a means of urban identity constructing (Ekaterinburg in internet-forums)]. Ural’skij istoriceskij vestnik, 52 (3):43-51.
[8] Ilchenko, M. 2016. “‘Green’ Utopia of the Uralmash: Institutional Effects and Symbolic Meaning.” Critical Housing Analysis, 3 (2): 52-60.
[9] Ilchenko, M. 2017. “Nezavershjonnyj proekt kak forma vosprijatija sovetskogo gradostroitel’stva 1920-1930-h godov: opyt socialisticheskih gorodov” [Unfinished project as a way to conceive the Soviet urban planning of 1920-1930s: the case of Socialist Cities]. Siberian Historical Research, 2: 56-79.
[10] Ilchenko, M. 2012. “Soviet Avant-Garde Architecture by Post-Soviet Eyes: the Fate of the Uralmash House of Culture.” Catalogue of the 2nd Ural Industrial Biennial of Contemporary Art. Ekaterinburg.
[11] Japakov, A. 2002. “Vozvrashhenie imeni: Bela Sheffler” [The Return of the Name: Béla Scheffler]. Nauka i zhizn’, no. 12.
[12] Kropotov, S. et al., ed. 2014. Budushhee proshlogo: futurologija DK UZTM [The Future of the past: futurology the Uralmash Palace of Culture]. Ekaterinburg: Ekaterinburg Academy of Contemporary Art.
[13] Landry, C. 2008. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
[14] Obermair, V. and E. Shapiro-Obermair. 2008. Bol’shaja Moskva, kotoroj ne bylo. Zdanija sovetskogo avangarda v sovremennoj Moskve [Big Moscow which didn’t exist. Buildings of the Soviet Avant-garde in contemporary Moscow]. Viena, SCHLEBRÜGGE.EDITOR.
[15] Peck, J. 2008. “The Cult of Urban Creativity.” Kreativen: Wirkung. Urbane Kultur, Wissensökonomie Und Stadtpolitik. Bildung und Kultur. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung 2: 36-41.
[16] “‘Perevospityvaja’ Uralmash: bul’var Kul’tury reshili preobrazit’ zooparkom, katkom i gastrofestami. Interv’ju s V.Belous.” 2016. [“Rehabilitating” Uralmash: Bolevard of Culture Planned to Transform with Zoo, Ring Skate and Gastrofests. Interview with Vera Belous]. Retrieved from: http://www.e1.ru/news/spool/news_ id-452471-section_id-182.html
[17] “Proekt ‘Belaja Bashnja’. Koncepcija”. 2015. [The “White Tower” project. Conception].Retrieved from: http://www.tower1929.ru/dokumenty-proekta
[18] Progulki za iskusstvom: Leningrad – Moskva – Sverdlovsk. 2008. [Walks for art: Leningrad-Moscow-Sverdlovsk]. Saint-Petersburg: «Institut PRO ARTE».
[19] Rastorguyev, A. 2011. “Nasledie jeksperimenta. Iz istorii arhitekturnogo avangarda na Urale” [The Heritage of an Experiment. From the History of Architectural AvantGarde in Ural]. Ural, 8: 205-223.
[20] “Socgorod – gorod mechty. Reportazh ob art-proekte v Novokuznetske”. 2013. [Socialist City is a City of a Dream. Report on the art-project in Novokuznetsk]. 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.tvn-tv.ru/news/mountains_ economy/sotsgorod_gorod_mechty.html
[21] Starikov, A., V. Zvagelskaya, L. Tokmeninova, and E. Cherniak. 1998. Ekaterinburg - istorija goroda v arhitekture. [Ekaterinburg: History of the City through Architecture]. Ekaterinburg: “Sokrat”.
[22] Tokmeninova, L.I. ed. 2010. Bauhaus na Urale. Sohranenie nasledija: materialy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara, 22-24 avgusta 2008 g., Ekaterinburg [Bauhaus in the Urals. Preservation of the Heritage: Materials of the International Research Seminar, 22-24 August, 2008 Ekaterinburg]. Ekaterinburg: “Webster”.
[23] “Uralmash: Proizvodstvo budushhego. Koncepcija proekta” [Uralmash: Producing the Future. Project’s Concept]. 2016. Retrieved from: http://uralmashidea.ru/ o-proekte.html
[24] Vasiliev N.Y., E.B. Ovsiannikova, T.A. Voronzova, A.V. Tukanov, M.A. Tukanov and O.A. Panin.2014. Arhitektura Moskvy perioda NJePa i Pervoj pjatiletki [Architecture of Moscow in the period of NEP and the First Five-Year Plan]. Moscow.: ABCdesign.
[25] Veselkova, N., Vandyshev, M., & Pryamikova, E. 2016. “Diskurs prirody v molodyh gorodah” [The discourse of nature in young towns]. Sociologiceskoe obozrenie, 15 (1):112-133.
[26] Veselkova, N., Vandyshev, M., & Pryamikova, E. 2017. “Molodye goroda: masshtaby mest pamjati” [Young towns: scaling sites of memory]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 16 (3):36-65.
[27] “Zaterjannyj gorod budushhego. Anons vystavki «Bol’shoe Zaporozh’e 1930. Zaterjannyj gorod budushhego»”.2011. [Announcement of the exhibition “Big Zaporizhia 1930. Lost City of the Future”].Retrieved from: http://afisha.zp.ua/ vystavki/zateryannyy-gorod-buduschego_1304.html