Download fulltext HTML
De Asis, L. A., & Morales, R. A. (2018). Individual and Societal Factors Influencing Technology Adaptation of Rice Farmers in Northern Samar. KnE Social Sciences, 3(6), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2420

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2420

statistics

  • 2085 Abstract Views
  • 344 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • L A De Asis
    No author data available.
  • R A Morales
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Jun 4, 2018

Individual and Societal Factors Influencing Technology Adaptation of Rice Farmers in Northern Samar

KnE Social Sciences / 4th International Research Conference on Higher Education / Pages 789–798

Abstract

This study examined individual and societal factors influencing technology adaptation of rice farmers in Northern Samar. This study was carried out in purposively selected Barangays in the municipalities of San Roque, Pambujan and Rosario in Northern Samar. Data were collected from selected seven farmers through pre-tested interview schedule. Various qualitative analyses techniques were applied to arrive at meaningful results. Findings show that farmers have very low level of participation in various organizations. Factors affecting adaptation to new technologies included farmers’ perception to technologies, education and physical conditions of the area. Personal barriers to their adaptation to new technologies include low educational level
and lack of technical knowledge to technologies. Other factors include high cost of technologies and high interest rates of lending institutions. The municipal agriculture office did not provide enough technical support on how to use and acquire farming technologies. Generally, lack of technical skill and high financial requirements hinder farmers in technology adaptation. Mechanization does not even exist in harvesting
and post harvesting due to high cost.



Keywords: Farm practices, Adaptation, Personal and Societal Factors

References
[1] Ravitz J (2010). Beyond changing culture in small high schools: Reform models and changing instruction with project-based learning. Peabody Journal of Education 85 (3), 290-312


[2] Lazaro AA, EG Rubia, LP Almazan, and KL Heong. 1993. Farmers’ estimates of percent whiteheads (WH). International Rice Research Notes, 18,31.


[3] Judson E (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? - Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 33 (12). 123-130.


[4] Eckhardt, N.A., Cominelli, E., Galbiati, M., and Tonelli, C. (2009). The Future of Science: Food and Water for Life. Plant Cell, 21, 368–372.


[5] Feder, G. and Slade R. (1984). The Acquisition of Information and the Adoption of New Technology. American J. Agri. Econ., 66, 312-320.


[6] Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). (2009). Profile for Climate Change, Rome, Italy. P.28.


[7] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.