The Impregnable Composition Writing Competency and Teaching Writing Methodologies

Abstract

This study evaluated the composition writing competency of the Grade 7 students and focused on the following: teaching writing method/s used in the classroom; execution of the writing methods; composition writing competency of the PUP Laboratory High School grade seven students; and common errors PUP Laboratory High School grade seven students committed in composition writing. It used Descriptive Method in
Quantitative-Qualitative Approach. A writing test was used in this study. These were written using two styles such as: Free Writing Style and Guided Writing Style, and were checked by the three (3) seasoned English teachers. The findings revealed that the only teaching writing method used in the classroom is the combination of Process and Genre Methods; composition writing competency of the PUP Laboratory High School seniors in all writing styles in terms of: Content, Thesis Statement, Organization, and Language Use and Editing are rated Very Good to Good. The researcher concluded that the compositions still need substantiation, well-defined introduction and conclusion, and zero error in mechanics and grammar though such are rated Good to Very Good.



Keywords: Writing, Testing Writing, Teaching Writing, Polytechnic University of the Philippines

References
[1] Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.


[2] Brown, D. (1994). Teaching by Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 3nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.


[3] Bustos, A and Espiritu, S. (1996). Psychological, Anthropological and Sociological Foundations of Education. 2nd Ed. Quezon City, Philippines: Katha Publishing Co., Inc.


[4] Calderon, J. F. and Gonzales, E. C. (1993). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. Manila, Philippines: National Book Store.


[5] Jose-Cruz, C. (1997). Campus Journalism and School Paper Advising. 4th Ed. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store.


[6] Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural Thoughts Patterns in Intercultural Education. Language Learning. 16, 1-20.


[7] Keh, C. (1990) A Design for a Process Approach Writing Course. Forum. 28/1.


[8] Nunan, D. (2009). Second Language Learning and Teaching. Singapore: Cenage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.


[9] Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


[10] Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Campbridge: Campbridge University Press.


[11] Salkind, N. (2003) Exploring Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.


[12] Villamin, A. M., Salazar, E. L., Bala, E. C. and Sunga, N. R. (1994). Innovative Strategies in Communication Arts. Quezon City, Philippines: Phoenix Publishing House.


[13] Wrath, T. (2007). Strength Finder 2.0. New York: Gallup Press [14] Badger, R. & White, G. (2000). A Process-Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. ELT Journal, 54/2, 153-160


[15] Egipto, J. J. (2005). Writing Business Letters. Sampaloc, Manila: Rex Bookstore.