Professional Development of Public Secondary School Administrators: Basis for Lifelong Learning Framework


There is a need for school administrators of today to adapt to the current radical changes in the educational system. This includes the application of lifelong learning as stated in the United Nation’s sustainable development goals. For this reason, this study sought to develop a lifelong learning framework that will help enhance the professional development of school administrators. Data were gathered and processed using quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings revealed that only limited formal lifelong learning activities were attended by public secondary school administrators in the Division of Quezon due to the following emerging barriers: money, time, age, fear and necessity. The respondents’ knowledge of, skills in and
attitudes towards lifelong learning are deemed to be strong; however, results have shown that they have less knowledge compared to their skills and attitude. Eagerness is a stimulating factor which is vital in order to involve in the process of learning. Thus, results from this study showed that time, energy, confidence and self-motivation are some existing needs perceived by the respondents. Moreover, it also suggests that the administrators must be equipped with proper and ample knowledge of lifelong learning concepts since unconsciously they are already actively engaging themselves in it through their different daily activities. Furthermore, it is essential to create a specialized framework that will aid them to pursue continuous progress
throughout their profession. Hence, a lifelong learning framework for the professional development of public secondary school administrators was proposed and served as the primary outcome of this study.

Keywords: framework, lifelong learning, professional development, school administrators

[1] Nordstrom, N. (2006). Learning later: Living greater. U.S.A.: Sentient Publications. ISBN-13 978-1591810476

[2] Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Ubiquitous learning. Illinois: University of Illinois Press

[3] Knapper, C. (2006). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Cogan Page.

[4] UNESCO (2012). Education and skills for inclusive and sustainable development beyond 2015. Thematic Think Piece prepared for the United Nations Task Team on the Post-2015 United Nations Development Agenda. Retrieved from www.unesco. org/new/.../UNESCOConceptNotePost2015_ENG.pdf

[5] UNESCO (2015). UNESCO principles on Education for Development beyond 2015. Retrieved from

[6] UNESCO & UNICEF (2013). Making education a priority in the post-2015 development agenda: Report of the global thematic consultation on education in the Post2015 Development Agenda. Retrieved from files/Making_Education_a_Priority_in_the_Post 2015_Development_Agenda.pdf

[7] Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[8] Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.

[9] Taylor-Powell, E. & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. University of Wisconsin - Extension, Program Development and Evaluation. Retrieved from website:

[10] Kops, B. (2008). Older Adults in Lifelong Learning: Participation and Successful Aging. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. 34 (1) 37-62.

[11] Rubenson, K. (2006). Constructing the lifelong learning paradigm: Competing visions from the OECD and UNESCO. In S. Ehlers (Ed.), Milestones towards lifelong learning systems.151-170. Copenhagen: Danish University of Education Press.

[12] Smith, M. K. (2002). Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self direction and andragogy. Retrieved from

[13] Newhouse, P. (2002). Literature review: The impact of ICT in learning and teaching. Perth: Department of Education. ISBN 978-3-319-17727-4

[14] Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.

[15] Makgato, M. (2008). Challenges Contributing to Poor Integration of Educational Technology at Some Schools in South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of social sciences. 5 (20). Italy: MCSER Publishing. ISSN 2039-2117

[16] Riasati, M., Allahyar, N., Tan, K. (2012). Technology in Language Education: Benefits and Barriers. Journal of education and practice, 3(5). ISSN 2222-288

[17] Bingimlas, K. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environment: A Review of the Literature. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology, 5(3), 235-245. ISSN 1305-8223

[18] Sicilia, C. (2005). The challenges and benefits to teacher’s practices in constructivist learning environments supported by technology. Unpublished master’s thesis, McGill University, Montreal.

[19] Korte, W. & Husing, T. (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006: Final report from head teachers and classroom teachers’ surveys in 27 European countries. eLearning papers, 2(1). ISSN 1887-1542

[20] Albirini, A. (2006). Teacher’s attitudes toward information and communication technologies. The case of Syrian Efl teachers. Computer & Education, 47, 373-398.

[21] Maxwell, J. C. (2001). The 17 indisputable laws of teamwork. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson. ISBN-13 978-1400204731

[22] Bredeson, P. V., & Johansson, O. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-service Education, 26(2), 385-401. ISSN 1747- 5082

[23] McCombs, B. L. (2003). Applying educational psychology’s knowledge base in educational reform: From research to application to policy. Comprehensive handbook of psychology, 7, 583-607. NewYork: Wiley.

[24] Larson, A. & Milano, M. (2006). Barriers towards Participation in Adult Education and Training. European Conference on Educational Research. Retrieved from http://

[25] Chisholm, L., Larson, A., & Mosseux, A.-F. (2004). Lifelong learning: Citizens’ views in close-up. Findings from a dedicated Eurobarometer survey. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

[26] Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Paris: OECD.

[27] Reitzug, U. C. (2002). School reform proposals: The research evidence. Retrieved from 202002- 01/Chapter%2012-Rei

[28] Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2000). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.

[29] Fair Go Project. (2006). School is for me: Pathway to student engagement. Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from

[30] Desjardins, R., Rubenson, K., & Milana, M. (2001). Unequal changes to participate in adult learning. International perspectives. Paris: UNESCO. ISBN 9780662467793

[31] Tuijnman, A., & Hellström, Z. (2001). Currious minds. Nordic adult education compared. København: Nordic Council of Ministers.

[32] Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1999). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). USA: Longman. ISBN-13 978-0205488490

[33] North American Association of Educational Negotiators. (1999). Motivating Teachers to Improve Instruction. Oregon: Author, 15(1).

[34] New National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Job Satisfaction Among Americas Teachers: Effects of Workplace Conditions, Background Characteristics, and Teacher Compensation. Washington, DC.

[35] Menec, V. H. (2003). The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Gerontology Social Sciences, 58B(2), S74–S82.