The Character of Sovereignty in the Framework of International Economic Law and Its Progress in Asean Community

Authors

  • L L Lombok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i5.2344

Abstract

The last decade of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century was the most challenging periods of the various theories and assumptions of the concept of sovereignty, which has become fragile because of the forces of globalization. The biggest problem of these forces clearly is at the level of state sovereignty. South East Asia, which starting to put into practice its Economic Community through ASEAN, regionally has a lack of experience in facing those theoretical changes. This research examines the relevance of sovereignty concept in international law and its changes, and how the countries in South East Asia through their Economic Community respond about this. By reviewing various journals from international law experts, reports from some of the South-East Asia’s leading economic institutions, as well as examining reports and statements of South East Asia’s state institutions, this research concludes that the opposition to the sovereignty as a normative idea does not need to be encouraged to produce something that degrade the concept and produce a new concept of sovereignty which is considered to be satisfactory to all countries. South East Asia Economic Community may be considered weakens the concept of sovereignty that has been applied for so long in this region, but it would not necessarily add to the opposition to the traditional concept of absolute sovereignty, because apparently, it will provide some possibility for some countries to project their sovereignty and interests globally.

 

 

Keywords: ASEAN, Economic community, Globalization, International law, South East Asia, Sovereignty

References

Friedman TL. The lexus and the olive tree: Understanding globalization. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, New York;1999, p. xviii http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/$ sim$luis/egcec/livros/globaliz/The LexusandtheOliveTree.pdf

Newton K, Van Deth JW. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2005. p.22 http://www. nicat-mammadli.narod.ru/b1.html/b36.pdf

Merriam Jr. CE. History of the theory of sovereignty since Rousseau. Batoche Books, Canada; 2001. p.95-112 https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/ merriam/sovrou.pdf

Peters A. Humanity as the alpha and omega of sovereignty. European Journal of International Law 2009;20(3):513-544. [Online] from http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/20/3/1852.PDF

Potter DW. State responsibility, sovereignty and failed states paper presented in: 2004 Australasian Political Studies Association Conference. 29 September – 1 October 2004. Adelaide, South Australia. [Online] from [Accessed on 19

Verellen T. What to do with sovereignty. Jura Falconis 2010;47:417-440, p.417. [Online] from https://www.law.kuleuven.be/apps/jura/content/art/ 47n3/verellen.pdf [Accessed on August 19

Tokár, A. Something happened sovereignty and european integration, in: Extraordinary Times, IWM Junior Visiting Fellows Conferences Vol. 11, Institutfür die Wissenschaftenvom Menschen, Vienna, 2001, p3-4. [Online] from http: //www.iwm.at/publications/junior-visiting-fellows-conferences/vol-xi/ something-happened-sovereignty-and-european-integration/ [Accessed on August 20

NaganWP, Hammer C. The changing character of sovereignty in international law and international relations. Columbia Journal Transnational Law. 2003;43(1):141- 187,p.142. [Online] from http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1592&context=facultypub [Accessed on August 21

Riyanto S. Kedaulatan negara dalam kerangka hukum internasional kontemporer [State sovereignty within the framework of contemporary international law], Jurnal Yustsia Universitas Negeri Surakarta 84 2012; 84:5-14, p.8 [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/download/10074/8990

Briggs HW. De facto and de jure recognition: The Arantzazu Mendi. American Journal of International Law 1939;33:689–699 https://www. cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/ article/de-facto-and-de-jure-recognition-the-arantzazu-mendi/ 6D6DABB3FE619C8004A7A4C63C88F459

Kingsbury B. Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law 1998;9(1):599-625, p.603. [Online] from https://doi.org/10.2307/2192880 [Accessed on August 21

Lence RM (Ed). Union and liberty the political philosophy of John C Calhoun by John Calhoun. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis;1992.p.266 http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/ calhoun-union-and-liberty-the-political-philosophy-of-john-c-calhoun

Walker N(Ed). Sovereignty in transition. Hart Publishing, Oxford;2003. p.3-32 https://books.google.co.id/books id=u_Ifj1d1Ja4C&dq=13.%09Walker%20N(Ed).%20Sovereignty%20in%20transition.%20Hart 20Publishing&hl=id&source=gbs_book_other_versions

Lauterpacht SH. The development of international law by international court. Frederick A. Praeger Publisher, New York; 1958. p.300-306 https://books.google. co.id/books?id=hrBp85NknioC

Association of Southeast Asian Nastions. “Press Statement by the Chairperson of the 9

Acharya A. Constructing asecurity community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge, London; 2009. p.16 https://books. google.co.id/books?id=_btoVz9D9fgC&dq=16.+Acharya+A.+Constructing+ asecurity+community+in+Southeast+Asia:+ASEAN+and+the+problem+of+ regional+order&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Deutsch K. Political community and the North Atlantic Area: International organisation in the light of historical experience. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 1957. p.5 https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/25427470

Deutsch K. The analysis of international relations, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey; 1988. p. 276 https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/10786450

Panagariya A. Core WTO agreements: Trade in goods and services and intellectual property. [Online] from http://www.columbia.edu/$sim$ap2231/Courses/ wto-overview.pdf. [Accesed on August 19

Mo JS. International commercial law, 2nd edn. Butterworths Publishing, Sydney; 2000. p.575 https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/6442511

Bronckers M. More power to the wto.Journal of International Economic Law 2000;4(1):41-65, p.41 https://academic.oup.com/jiel/article/4/1/41/878870

Funston J.ASEAN and the principle of non-intervention: practice and prospect. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore; 2000. p.1-2 https://bookshop. iseas.edu.sg/publication/1706#contents

Mill JS. A few words on non-intervention. Foreign Policy Perspectives No. 8,p.2. [Online] from http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/forep/forep008. pdf [Accessed on August 25

Severino R. Southeast Asia in search of an ASEAN community: Insights from the former ASEAN secretary general. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore; 2006. p.9. [Online] from https://muse.jhu.edu/book/19498 [Accessed on August 25

Association of Southeast Asian Nastions. “Chairman’s Press Statement on ASEAN 3

Association of Southeast Asian Nations.“Chairman’s Statement of the 11

Association of Southeast Asian Nations.“Chairman’s Statement of the 13

Downloads

Published

2018-05-23

How to Cite

Lombok, L. L. (2018). The Character of Sovereignty in the Framework of International Economic Law and Its Progress in Asean Community. KnE Social Sciences, 3(5), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i5.2344