The Identification of Facts and Legal Issues as First Steps Towards Fair Settlement of the Delimitation Dispute Over the Ambalat Block Between Indonesia and Malaysia
Abstract
The purpose of this research is not to draw a conclusive limitation of the delimitation claims over Ambalat Block by both Indonesia and Malaysia. Rather this research shall act as a preliminary study to identify the issues and legal principles behind the dispute in order to reach an equitable sharing of resources. This research is a legal research, thus the data collecting method emphasizes on literature research to obtain primary legal material, secondary legal material and non-legal materials, which afterwards analyzed qualitatively using statutory approach. The result of the research showed that: (i) According to the identified facts and law, both Indonesia and Malaysia possess potential to claim over the Ambalat Block which are affected by the judgment of International Court of Justice in 2002; (ii) The identified legal premise comprises of three legal problem that needs to be addressed in the negotiation which are (a) Whether Sipadan and Ligitan Island qualified to be identified as an island under article 121 of United Nations Convention of Law of the Sea 1982, (b) Is the principle of “effective control” applicable as the legal basis to claim over continental shelf and (c) is the principle of equitable solution detrimental to the determination of delimitation of continental shelf.
Keywords: Ambalat Block, continental shelf, dispute, Indonesia, Malaysia
References
[1] International Court of Justice. Declaration of Judge Oda. In: Case concerning sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia V. Malaysia) (Merits) Judgement of 17 December 2002, [online] from http://www.icj-cij.org/ docket/files/102/10570.pdf. (2002). [Accessed on 3 October 2016]. http://www. icj-cij.org/files/case-related/102/10570.pdf
[2] Institute of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations (IDFR). 2009. Malaysia’s Territorial Disputes–Two Cases at The ICJ. p. 115. Kuala Lumpur, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.idfr.gov.my/images/stories/publication/2009/inside_pbp.pdf
[3] Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Hukum laut Indonesia. p. 84. Binacipta, Bandung; 1986. p. 388.
[4] Ocean and Law of the Sea. Article 13 and 121 of UNCLOS 1982. In: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Geneva, United Nation; 2001. p. 202. http:// www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
[5] Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Tribunal’s Consideration. In: PCA Case No. 2013-19 in the matter of the South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) Award of 12 July 2016. p. 204. Hague, Permanent Court of Arbitration. p. 501. [online] from https://www.pcacases. com/web/sendAttach/2086. (2016). [Acessed on 4 October 2016] https://www. pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086
[6] Sebastian, CAF, Mumby P, Ward S. Assesment of the potensial environmental consequenses of construction activities on seven reefs in Spratly Island in South China Sea arbitration. [online] from https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ 2993893-Independent-Expert-Report-Coral-Reef-Environment.html (2016). [Accessed 10 October 2016]. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ 2993893-Independent-Expert-Report-Coral-Reef-Environment.html
[7] Druce, Stephen C, Baikoeni, Yoni E. Circumventing conflict: The Indonesia-Malaysia ambalat block dispute. In: Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management. Oishi M (Ed.). Springer, Singapore; 2016. p. 205. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811000409
[8] Arsana IMA. Challenges and opportunities in the delimitation of Indonesia’s maritime boundaries: A legal and technical approach. In: Univeristy of Wollongong Thesis Collections. p. 248–250. Wollongong, University of Wollongong Australia. p. 461 [online] from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=5047&context=theses (2014). [Accessed on 4 October 2016] http://ro. uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5047&context=theses
[9] Forbes VL. 2014. Indonesia’s Delimited Maritime Boundaries. Springer, Heidelberg; 2014. p. 266. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642543944
[10] Schofield C, Arsana IMA. 2009. Beyond the Limits? Outer Continental Shelf Opportunities and Challenges in East and Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2009;31(1):28–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41288788.pdf? refreqid=search%3Aab035238790752af17354802c47cc9dd