Analysis of the Perception Index of Regional Government Development Performance in Boyolali Regency

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i17.19325

Keywords:

development, index, perception, performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the political preferences of the community in Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia, based on a survey conducted in July 2024. The evaluation was carried out using a survey method to measure the level of community satisfaction with various development indicators. The survey population consists of residents listed in the Permanent Voters List (DPT) for the 2024 elections, with a total of 825,630 voters, comprising 408,654 males and 416,976 females. The research sample involved 700 respondents selected randomly through random sampling techniques based on polling stations as Survey Location Points (TLS). The survey was conducted at 100 polling stations with 7 respondents per polling station, resulting in a margin of error of 4–5% and a confidence level of 95%. The survey findings provide an overview of preferences based on age, gender, and socio-economic status. The results indicate that public perception of the performance of regional government development is greatly influenced by socio-economic and regional factors. The main recommendation is the need to improve communication and socialization of development policies more evenly across all areas, which can serve as a reference for the Boyolali regional government in formulating more effective development policies.

References

[1] Ahmed M, Setyobudi H, Widodo D. Masyarakat dan Persepsi Pembangunan. Jurnal Pembangunan Nasional. 2019;22(4):98–112.

[2] Halim R, Susanto S, Zulkifli A. Partisipasi Publik dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik. 2020;16(1):130–43.

[3] Lo S, Nugraha Y, Suryadi T. Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah: Studi di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintah Daerah. 2018;10(2):72–85.

[4] Sunardi., Djazuli, A., Handayani, R D., Hidayat, B A., Saksono, H. The Role of Human Development in Improving Local Government Performance Through Good Government Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja. 2022;14(3):571-582

[5] Sugiyono A. Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah dalam Mengelola Pembangunan Daerah. Journal of Regional Development. 2019;15(3):156–70.

[6] Wahyuni NK, Mahaputra IN, Sudiartana IM. Pengaruh kebijakan pajak, sosialisasi perpajakan, kesadaran wajib pajak, Tingkat kepercayaan wajib pajak dan ketegasan sanksi perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak orang probadi di kantor pelayanan pajak pratama Bandung Utara. Karma. 2020;2(1):2241–9.

[7] Aitalieva, N R., Morelock A L. Citizens’ Perceptions of Government Policy Success: A Cross-National. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs. 2019;5(2):198–216.

[8] Boyne GA, Meier KJ, O’Toole LJ, Walker RM. Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

[9] Hansen KM, Ferlie E. Accountability and Public Management Reform. Public Manage Rev. 2017;19(7):938–59.

[10] Bastian I. Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Pengantar. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2010.

[11] Chen C, Ao Y, Wang Y, Li J. Performance appraisal method for rural infrastructure construction based on public satisfaction. PLoS One. 2018 Oct;13(10):e0204563.

[12] Iskandar M, Saputra B. Dampak Pembangunan Ekonomi Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Boyolali. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi. 2023;28(3):100–12.

[13] Engkus., Trisakti, F., Afiyah, S., Murmawan., Suparman, N. Bureaucratic corruptive behavior: causes and motivation of state civil aparatures in Indonesia. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2020;24(4):1475–7192.

[14] Suwana, A., Setyobudi, Y F. Kinerja pemerintah desa dalam Pembangunan infrastruktur jalan dan drainase di desa Parit kecamatan Karimun tahun 2018. Jurnal Trias Politika. 2018: 4(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

Sunggingprobo, S. A., & Suwardi, ‎. (2025). Analysis of the Perception Index of Regional Government Development Performance in Boyolali Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(17), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i17.19325