Social Innovation as a Step Towards Proper Governance: A Case Study of Community-based Development Planning in Lebakgedong Sub-Distrik Lebak Regency

Authors

  • Arya Samudera Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9573-5460
  • Feby Anggraeni Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Rizqi Khoirun Nisa Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Alih Aji Nugroho Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19201

Keywords:

social innovation, community-based development, village development index

Abstract

This study aims to explore and analyze the process of social innovation in the implementation of community-based development planning in Banjar Irigasi Village in Lebakgedong District as an effort to realize proper governance. It uses a qualitative method in the form of descriptive analysis through primary and secondary data. Data are collected through interviews and observations. The results show that: 1) An obstacle in the process of creating innovation is budget limitations, therefore the only social innovation created in Banjar Irigasi Village is the Jumat Serius program. 2) The Jumat Serius program was chosen to overcome the problem of stunting in this village by inviting donations from the community and village officials. The “Jumat Serius” Program is a program in Banjar Irigasi Village to reduce stunting and hunger rates, carried out by prioritizing the principle of mutual cooperation and inviting all village officials and communities to donate a minimum of 1000 rupiah. The donations collected will be distributed to people in need in the form of basic necessities, cash, and nutritious food. This program not only provides a change in community behavior, but also succeeds in reducing the stunting rate in Banjar Irigasi Village.

References

[1] Handraini H, Frinald A, Magriasti L. Konsep Desentralisasi Dan Otonomi Daerah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemerintahan Desa Di Indonesia. 2024;11(2):601–8.

[2] Rachmad AF, Xusan QN, Azzahra N, Azaria E. Pengaruh Kebijakan Desentralisasi Terhadap Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Daerah. J Serambi Huk. 2023;16(2).

[3] Hadiwijoyo SS. Anisa FD. Sistem Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Pemerintah Daerah. kesatu. Depok: Rajawali Pers; 2019.

[4] Castro-Arce K, Vanclay F. Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: an analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives [Internet]. J Rural Stud. 2019 Jan;2020(74):45–54.

[5] MacCallum D, Moulaert F, Leubolt B, Mehmood A. Social innovation as a trigger for transformations. Luxembourg: European Union; 2017.

[6] Sambodo MT, Hidayat S, Rahmayanti AZ, Handoyo FW, Yuliana CI, Hidayatina A, et al. Towards a New approach to community-based rural development: lesson learned from Indonesia. Cogent Soc Sci. 2023;9(2):2267741.

[7] Maryani AS, Eka A. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan di Desa Sekura, Kecamatan Teluk Keramat, Kabupaten Sambas. PESIRAH J Adm Publik. 2023;3(1):1–6.

[8] Evers A. Ewert B. Social Innovation for Social Cohesion. New Front Soc Innov Res; 2016. pp. 107–27.

[9] Caccarino I. D M, Fernandes Rodrigues, Susana, C S. Resilience through social innovation for sustainable development. Innov Manag Rev. 2022;20(2):279–91.

[10] Westley F. Social Innovation and Resilience : How One Enhances the Other. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2013;11(3):6–8.

[11] Hubert A. Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Brussel. European Commission; 2010.

[12] Rhodes ML, McQuaid S, Donnelly-Cox G. Social innovation and temporary innovations systems (TIS): insights from nature-based solutions in Europe. Soc Enterp J. 2002;18(2):252–70.

[13] Firdaus A. Inovasi Sosial di Hutan Wakaf Bogor dalam Mencapai Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. J Ilm Ekon Islam. 2024;10(1):64.

[14] Murray R, Caulier-Grice J, Mulgan G. The Open Book of Social Innovation. Birmingham: The Young Foundation; 2010.

[15] Hidayat S. Menimbang Ulang Konsep Good Governance: diskursus Teoretis. J Masy Indones. 2016;42(2):151–65.

[16] Salvioni DM. Corporate Governance and Global Responsibility. SYMPHONYA Emerg Issues Manag [Internet]. 2003; Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2577367

[17] Kamaluddin S. Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik (Good Governance) Pada Kantor DISTRK OKHIKA Kabupaten Pegunungan Bintang. Papua Rev J Ilmu Adm dan Ilmu Pemerintah. 2019;3(1):222–8.

[18] Basri YM, Findayani TI, Zarefar A. Implementation Of Good Governance To Improve The Performance Of Village Governments. J Akunt. 2021;11(2):123–36.

[19] Ali K, Saputra A. Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa Terhadap Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik Di Desa Pematang Johar. J dharmawangsa. 2020;14(4):602–14.

[20] Hajar S, Ali K, Saputra A. Optimalisasi Pelayanan Publik dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa di Desa Pematang Johar. J Ilm Muqoddimah [Internet]. 2021;6(1):136–42. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/97990203/pdf.pdf

[21] Sugioyono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2012.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

Samudera, A., Anggraeni, F., Nisa, R. K., & Nugroho, A. A. (2025). Social Innovation as a Step Towards Proper Governance: A Case Study of Community-based Development Planning in Lebakgedong Sub-Distrik Lebak Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(16), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19201