Management of SamiSade in Village Infrastructure Development in Bogor Regency

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19194

Keywords:

development, village, SamiSade

Abstract

The One Billion One Village Program (SamiSade) in Bogor Regency is a crucial initiative aimed at accelerating village infrastructure development and reducing the developmental gap between rural and urban areas. While this program has improved the quality of life for rural communities, its implementation faces several significant challenges. The identified issues in SamiSade management include the inefficient use of funds, lack of oversight and transparency, and project delays. Funds are often misallocated and or experience overruns due to inadequate planning and poor coordination. Additionally, financial accountability processes frequently do not adhere to applicable accounting standards, leading to undetected fund misuse. This study analyzes the management of the SamiSade Program and formulates policy recommendations for its management. It contributes to the literature on managing village infrastructure and development programs and proposes relevant policies. This study was conducted through observation and in-depth interviews with relevant departments and agencies. It highlights the need for clear and firm regulations on SamiSade fund management to enhance transparency and accountability as well as close loopholes that allow fund misappropriation. Implementing such a policy is expected to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of SamiSade fund management, as well as the sustainability of village infrastructure. This will maximize the program’s benefits for all village residents while supporting national development.

References

[1] Hazlinda H, Siti NA. Sustainable village designs to reverse migration trends. United Nations Sustainable Development. 2014. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or

[2] Schilling J, Fu S, Freemark Y. Promoting equitable development in communities. Urban Institute. 2024. Available from: https://urban.org

[3] Yabbar M, Hamzah S. Implementation of Good Village Governance in Village Financial Management. SOSHUM: Journal of Social and Humanities. 2020;10(3):338–50.

[4] Gitosaputro S. Rangga K. Community Development and Empowerment: Concept, Theory, and Application in the Era of Regional Autonomy. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2015.

[5] Prawira A. Development Inequality and Regional Development Policy. Journal of Social and Political Sciences. 2020;12(1):45–60.

[6] Hapsari N. Sudarsono, Nugroho A. Analysis of the Role of Infrastructure in Rural Economic Development. J Econ Dev. 2021;19(2):125–36.

[7] Mardiana N. Ismail. Access to Education and Health in Rural Areas. Journal of Education and Health. 2022;15(3):90–100.

[8] Nugroho S. Urbanization and Development Inequality: A Case Analysis in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Public Policy. 2019;8(1):77–85.

[9] Sutoro H. Social Inequality and Political Stability: A Development Perspective. Journal of Politics and Social. 2020;11(4):210–23.

[10] Hidayat T, Suryani S. Village Development Planning: Community Needs Analysis. Journal of Village Development. 2020;8(2):65–72.

[11] Rahmawati I, Mardiana N. Village Financial Management: challenges and Solutions. J Am Sci. 2021;10(3):102–12.

[12] Mdee A, Mushi D. Exploring social accountability approaches in local governance: evidence from Tanzania. Int J Public Adm. 2021;44(4):348–60.

[13] Overman S, Schillemans T. The role of felt accountability in public sector performance. Public Adm Rev. 2022;82(1):63–77.

[14] Schillemans T, Bovens M. The role of boards in public accountability: a comparative study. Public Manage Rev. 2019;21(8):1109–29.

[15] Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

Wulandari, S., & Sutrisno, E. (2025). Management of SamiSade in Village Infrastructure Development in Bogor Regency. KnE Social Sciences, 10(16), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19194