Learning Organization Strategy for Globalization Challenges in the Public Sector: A Blibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19188Keywords:
learning organization, globalization challenges, public sectorAbstract
In the face of rapid globalization, public sector organizations are under increasing pressure to innovate and adapt to remain efficient and relevant. The aim of this research is to examine the ways in which learning organizations can effectively tackle the obstacles presented by globalization within the public sector. Through a thorough literature review, this study synthesizes findings from multiple scholarly sources to identify key frameworks and strategies that support organizational learning in public institutions. Particularly in developed nations, there has been a notable surge in public sector research on learning organizations in recent times. Based on publication trends, the data suggest a surge of research in 2023, although there is a decline in the following year. Most of the research focuses on social science disciplines (44.8%), covering managerial and public policy aspects, as well as on business, management, environmental science, and computer science. Visualization of the keyword network through VOS Viewer highlights key concepts such as learning, innovation, policy, and public sector, illustrating the importance of innovation and policy in organizational learning in the public sector. Countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States dominate the number of publications, followed by other European countries. The dominance of developed countries reflects infrastructure readiness and higher attention to improving public sector efficiency through organizational learning. Going forward, it is predicted that research in this area will increasingly focus on technology integration and sustainability, along with the need for the public sector to continue to innovate in the face of global change.
References
[1] Farazmand A. Globalization and Public Administration. Wiley Am Soc Public Adm are Collab with JSTOR to Digit Preserv extend access to Public Adm Rev. 2014;59(6):509–22.
[2] Sihaloho H, Zein S, Hasibuan N, Manodohon MA, Dirgantara U, Suryadarma M, et al. Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities for the Development of Economic Globalization in Business Law in Indonesia Keywors : Challenges Analisis Tantangan dan Peluang Perkembangan Globalisasi Ekonomi dalam Hukum Bisnis Di Indonesia. 2023;2(11):1751–64.
[3] UNDP. Human Development Report 2020. 2020.
[4] Senge PM. The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Crown Business; 2014.
[5] Ashal N. The Impact of Learning Organization on Intrapreneurship : The Case of Jordanian Pharmaceutics. 2023;1–20.
[6] World Economic Forum. Future Of Job Report. The Future Of Homo. 2023. 1–183 p.
[7] Prasanna R, Jayasundara J, Kumara S, Gamage N, Ekanayake EMS. Sustainability of SMEs in the Competition : A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance. 2019;1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040100.
[8] Wynen J, Boon J, Kleizen B, Verhoest K. How Multiple Organizational Changes Shape Managerial Support for Innovative Work Behavior. Evidence From the Australian Public Service; 2019. pp. 1–25.
[9] Luz G, Mac A, Vergara C, Garza-reyes JA, Federal U, Catarina DS. Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4. 0 adoption : an empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers [Internet]. Int J Prod Econ. 2019 Jul;2020(219):284–94.
[10] Boak G. Action learning and innovation. 2022;2–4. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14767333.2022.2130721.
[11] Kasych A, Vochozka M. Globalization processes in the modern world challenging the national economy development. 2019;09002:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/ 20196509002.
[12] Kordab M, Raudeliūnienė J, Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I. Mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between organizational learning and sustainable organizational performance. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(23):1–20.
[13] Khairul Ikhwan, Budi rahardjo shinta ratnawati. View of Learning Organization in Determining Supply Chain Performance.pdf. 2021.
[14] Cappellari G, Welter CV, Hermes LC, Sausen JO. Absorptive capacity: Components and organizational mechanisms for its development. Rev Adm Mackenzie; 2019.
[15] de Barcelona A. Annual Report on Public Services. 2020
[16] Hussein N, Omar S, Noordin F, Ishak NA. Learning Organization Culture, Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness in a Public Institution of Higher Education in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study. Procedia Econ Finance. 2016;37(16):512–9.
[17] Al Marshoudi FB, Jamaluddin Z, Ba Aween AM, Al Balushi FI, Mohammad BA. The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement in the Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Organizational Performance. Int J Manag Think. 2023;1(2):40–61.
[18] Nations U. World Population Prospects. 2021.
[19] McKinsey C&. The Future of Work: A Journey to 2022. 2020.
[20] Derrington SF, Paquette E, Johnson KA. Cross-cultural interactions and shared decision-making. Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(142 Suppl 3):S187–92.
[21] Transparency International. Corruption perceptions. 2023;16.
[22] Garvin DA. Learning Organizations at Work: Harvard B-School Professor David Garvin discusses Learning in Action. Corporate University Review; 2000.
[23] Chakraborty S. Examining the Impact of Training and Development on Organizational Performance: An Analysis of Strategic Fit. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2023;5(6).
[24] Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg L. Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Adm Rev 77(5), 668-678. 2017;77(5):668–78.
[25] Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. ATD Press; 2016.
[26] Xavier J, Picoto WN. Regulation of data-driven marketing and management theory: bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Law and Management. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-02-2023- 0022.
[27] Linnenluecke MK, Marrone M, Singh AK. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust J Manag. 2020;45(2):175–94.
[28] van Zuuren EJ, Logullo P, Price A, Fedorowicz Z, Hughes EL, Gattrell WT. Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep;12(9):e065154.
[29] Pulsiri N, Vatananan-thesenvitz R. Improving Systematic Literature Review with Automation and Bibliometrics. 2018;(Figure 1). https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2018. 8481746.
[30] Richards LK. Thematic framework of online review research: A systematic analysis of contemporary literature on seven major hospitality and tourism journals. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2017;29(1):307–54.
[31] Moed HF, Markusova V, Akoev M. Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science [Internet]. Scientometrics. 2018;116(2):1153–80.
[32] Amplayo RK, Hong S, Song M. Network-based approach to detect novelty of scholarly literature. 2018;422:542–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.037.
[33] He M. A Review on Studies of Theme in Academic Writing. :25–35.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Riska Firdaus, Muhammad Yunus, Muhammad Rusdi, Muhammad Akmal Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
